2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formaldehyde removal by potted plant–soil systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
52
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing light intensity is found to have a positive effect on VOC removal efficiencies and rates (Baosheng et al 2009;Kondo et al 1995;Oyabu et al 2003a,c;Porter 1994;Sawada and Oyabu 2008;Xu et al 2011). As example, Nerium indicum exhibited a clear increase in formaldehyde removal rate with increasing light intensity (Fig.…”
Section: Lightmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing light intensity is found to have a positive effect on VOC removal efficiencies and rates (Baosheng et al 2009;Kondo et al 1995;Oyabu et al 2003a,c;Porter 1994;Sawada and Oyabu 2008;Xu et al 2011). As example, Nerium indicum exhibited a clear increase in formaldehyde removal rate with increasing light intensity (Fig.…”
Section: Lightmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, the soil had been covered with a Teflon bag for the examination of the aerial plant parts, and the root zone was investigated by surgically removing the aboveground parts. Xu et al (2011) investigated the soil by removing the aboveground parts as well as the roots from the soil. For formaldehyde removal by Chlorophytum comosum, Aloe vera and Epipremnum aureum the soil contributed with 45-55 %.…”
Section: Removal Of Vocs By Growing Media and Rootsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood et al 2002;Orwell et al 2004). Reported formaldehyde removal rates by plant tissues alone were found to be so low as to be insignificant for IAQ improvement purposes (Schmitz et al 2000), whilst substantial formaldehyde removal has been detected for individual bacterial species associated with an active biofilter (Wang and Zhang 2011), and also for indoor plants when the substrate was also present (Xu et al 2011). The removal of several other contaminants, however, such as CO 2 (Oh et al 2011, Torpy et al 2014, SO x , NO x (Elkiey and Ormrod 1981;Esguerra et al 1983) and ozone (Elkiey and Ormrod 1981) appear to be mostly or wholly plant mediated, and are taken up directly through the stomates (gas exchange pores) of the green shoots, which in most species are open only during daylight hours, and not in the dark.…”
Section: Phytoremediation and Horticultural Biotechnologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main human exposure pathways of HCHO are inhalation of gaseous HCHO from the air or transdermal absorption of aqueous HCHO (Gelbke et al, 2014). Therefore, the required time is more available as the indicator to evaluate the performance of a biological method for indoor HCHO removal (Darlington et al, 1998;Xu et al, 2011;Dela Cruz et al, 2014).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Plants On Volatile Hcho Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple boxesmodeling was used in a laboratory-type test to describe the performance of planting on the cleaning of indoor air. Although the earlier laboratory studies have demonstrated the ability of bioremediation technologies to remove VOCs (Kim et al, 2008;Xu et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2011;Dela Cruz et al, 2014;Gawronska and Bakera, 2015;Pandey et al, 2016;Hong et al, 2017), no experimental field-study has been made to investigate the potted-plant can bring about significant reductions of VOC pollution in the real environments. Our study might provide an accurate and relatively accessible platform for the public, interior designers and engineers to determine if the health risks of VOCs in their building space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%