2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03276-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formaldehyde biodegradation in an ASBR-SBR system: an effective treatment solution for furniture industry painting booth wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bolognese et al mentioned that high HRT (4 days in ASBR and 2 days in SBR) was required to remove formaldehyde. In addition, in the study by Bolognese et al, the concentration of formaldehyde was equal to 180 mg/L, which was very low compared to the present study (30). In the study by Mei et al, using a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor with a short HRT (4 hours) and an inlet formaldehyde concentration of 116 mg/L (in the presence of the co-substrate methanol), the removal rates of formaldehyde and COD reached 99.9% and 81.5%, respectively (9).…”
Section: The Effect Of the Different Hydraulic Retention Timecontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Bolognese et al mentioned that high HRT (4 days in ASBR and 2 days in SBR) was required to remove formaldehyde. In addition, in the study by Bolognese et al, the concentration of formaldehyde was equal to 180 mg/L, which was very low compared to the present study (30). In the study by Mei et al, using a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor with a short HRT (4 hours) and an inlet formaldehyde concentration of 116 mg/L (in the presence of the co-substrate methanol), the removal rates of formaldehyde and COD reached 99.9% and 81.5%, respectively (9).…”
Section: The Effect Of the Different Hydraulic Retention Timecontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Reports have shown that when ASBRs can be used to treat beer wastewater with an organic loading rate between 1.5 and 5.0, the removal efficiency of COD reached 90% (Shao et al, 2008). The realization of efficient removal of organic matter and ammonia nitrogen has spurred researchers to adopt integrated systems of anaerobic and aerobic treatment using a combination of ASBRs and SBRs (Bolonhesi et al, 2021). Wang showed that using a combined ASBR and modified SBR process generated increased the TN and COD removal efficiencies to 95 and 90% from treated landfill leachate with influent NH 4 + -N and COD contents of 1,100 and 6,000 mg/L, respectively (Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%