1989
DOI: 10.1086/168057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formaldehyde absorption toward W51

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 13 we compare the evolution of the H ii volume‐weight ionization fractions (top panel) and the resultant evolution of the optical depth to electron scattering τ e (bottom panel) for three different cases for this form: (1) k = 0 (solid line), which represents our fiducial model with zero boosting; (2) k = 0.13 (dotted line), which represents the scenario where the combination of f esc = 0.20 and the boosting factor may be thought of in terms of an escape fraction which evolves from 0.20 at z = 6 (necessary to provide a consistent match with the Becker et al 2001 observations) to unity at z = 18 around when the first star‐forming sources turn on; and (3) k = 0.33 (dashed line), which is meant to serve as an illustrative example of the additional ionizing boost necessary at high redshifts in order to match the electron optical depth measurement implied by the Kogut et al (2003)‘model independent’ analysis. The electron optical depth was calculated using where σ T = 6.65 × 10 −25 cm 2 is the Thomson cross‐section and n e ( z ′) is the mean electron number density at z ′.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Fig. 13 we compare the evolution of the H ii volume‐weight ionization fractions (top panel) and the resultant evolution of the optical depth to electron scattering τ e (bottom panel) for three different cases for this form: (1) k = 0 (solid line), which represents our fiducial model with zero boosting; (2) k = 0.13 (dotted line), which represents the scenario where the combination of f esc = 0.20 and the boosting factor may be thought of in terms of an escape fraction which evolves from 0.20 at z = 6 (necessary to provide a consistent match with the Becker et al 2001 observations) to unity at z = 18 around when the first star‐forming sources turn on; and (3) k = 0.33 (dashed line), which is meant to serve as an illustrative example of the additional ionizing boost necessary at high redshifts in order to match the electron optical depth measurement implied by the Kogut et al (2003)‘model independent’ analysis. The electron optical depth was calculated using where σ T = 6.65 × 10 −25 cm 2 is the Thomson cross‐section and n e ( z ′) is the mean electron number density at z ′.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The uncertainty associated with this measurement depends on fitting all parameters concerned with the TT power spectrum and the TE cross‐power spectrum. Kogut et al (2003) obtain a 68 per cent confidence range of 0.13 < τ e < 0.21 corresponding to an instantaneous reionization epoch which occurred for 14 < z < 20. None of the models we have considered in this paper is able reionize the Universe by such early redshifts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relatively bright rest‐frame ultraviolet continuum flux and Lyman α line luminosity of SBM03#3 and the recent WMAP results which indicate the epoch of reionization to lie at z > 10 (Kogut et al 2003) bode well for searches for ultraviolet‐luminous star‐forming galaxies at z > 7, such as those that will be possible using the narrow‐band near‐infrared imaging system DAZLE (the Dark Ages ‘Z’ Lyman Explorer: McMahon et al, in preparation), HST /WFC3 and James Webb Space Telescope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%