Formal women-only networks: literature review and propositions

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the emerging literature on formal women-only business networks and outline propositions to develop this under-theorised area of knowledge and stimulate future research. Design/methodology/approach The authors review the existing literature on formal internal and external women-only networks and use the broader social capital and network literature to frame their arguments and develop propositions. Findings Propositions are developed regarding how both internal and external formal women-only business networks can be of value for members, firms/organisations and the wider social group of women in business. Research limitations/implications The authors focus on the distinction between external and internal formal women-only networks while also acknowledging the broader diversity that can characterise such networks. Their review provides the reader with an insight into the state of the art and a set of propositions that present opportunities for future research. Practical implications The paper provides insights into how women in business, organisations and wider society can leverage value from both internal and external formal women-only business networks. Social implications The paper contributes to research showing that the social structure of interactions and context can impact women’s standing in the workplace. Originality/value The paper sheds light on the under-studied and under-theorised phenomenon of formal women-only business networks. Beyond the individual member level, the authors suggest that such networks can be of value for organisations and the wider social group of women in management and leadership positions.

Women in Management – Future Research Directions

“…Other interesting research issues concerning women in management positions comprise those focused on interactions in the workplace and their contexts. To be precise, they deal with how interactions influence women's behaviours (Villesèche & Josserand, 2017). Another interesting study focused on the behaviour of disabled women during the recruitment process.…”

Women and Business Networking: A Social Capital View

“…Women's ability to use informal networking for career development is limited (Dries and Pepermans 2007); hence, they enjoy less social capital which makes it difficult for them to develop connections and access the linked resources (Gamba and Kleiner 2001;Groysberg and Bell 2013). This contributes to the persistence of gendered career paths (Wilson 1998), and the gender imbalance continues to prevail, especially at higher hierarchical levels (Villesèche and Josserand 2017). All of these prevent women empowerment and therefore can delay UN's SDG5.…”

Feminism in women’s business networks: A freedom-centred perspective

“…Women’s business networks (WBNs) are independent, bottom-up initiatives that organise women’s voices and experiences to address the status quo in the gendered world of work (Dennissen et al, 2020; Villesèche and Josserand, 2017). Their bottom-up character differentiates them from employee resource groups (also known as diversity networks) within corporations where the control over initiatives and aims depends heavily on top-down decision-making (Donnellon and Langowitz, 2009).…”

“…WBNs provide women with the opportunity to join a public group and share their views on work-related issues that matter to them. They may also constitute platforms for advocacy work (Avdelidou-Fischer and Kirton, 2016; Villesèche and Josserand, 2017). In that sense, WBNs display what Aronson calls ‘feminist consciousness’, that is, an ‘awareness and critique of gender inequalities’ (2017: 335) that can lay the foundations for collective action.…”