2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10836-020-05904-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Verification of ECCs for Memories Using ACL2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Lean, a coding theory library called Cotoleta was developed and used to prove results about Levenshtein distance [14] and Hamming (7,4) codes [11]. Separately, Hamming(7,4) and 1 2 -rate convolutional codes were verified in the ACL2 theorem prover [20] with a particular focus on correcting memory errors; these codes were verified against a particular memory model. Both of these projects focused on verifying concrete-sized codes; thus they did not require the same level of abstraction or general mathematical reasoning as our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lean, a coding theory library called Cotoleta was developed and used to prove results about Levenshtein distance [14] and Hamming (7,4) codes [11]. Separately, Hamming(7,4) and 1 2 -rate convolutional codes were verified in the ACL2 theorem prover [20] with a particular focus on correcting memory errors; these codes were verified against a particular memory model. Both of these projects focused on verifying concrete-sized codes; thus they did not require the same level of abstraction or general mathematical reasoning as our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%