2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.04512
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Verification of a Map Merging Protocol in the Multi-Agent Programming Contest

Abstract: Communication is a critical part of enabling multi-agent systems to cooperate. This means that applying formal methods to protocols governing communication within multi-agent systems provides useful confidence in its reliability. In this paper, we describe the formal verification of a complex communication protocol that coordinates agents merging maps of their environment. The protocol was used by the LFC team in the 2019 edition of the Multi-Agent Programming Contest (MAPC). Our specification of the protocol … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have formally verified the protocol we made to merge map information [15]. Other than this we did not invest much time apart from the last few days before the contest when we tried to make the team more fault-tolerant towards task failures.…”
Section: Did You Invest Time In Making Your Agents More Robust/fault-...mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have formally verified the protocol we made to merge map information [15]. Other than this we did not invest much time apart from the last few days before the contest when we tried to make the team more fault-tolerant towards task failures.…”
Section: Did You Invest Time In Making Your Agents More Robust/fault-...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…FDR also includes the Probe tool, which allows the user to step through the available events in the specification. We summarise how we used FDR to formally verify the map merge protocol in Section 4.2, and a full description can be found in [15].…”
Section: Languages and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation