2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.entcs.2009.09.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Verification and Validation of UML 2.0 Sequence Diagrams using Source and Destination of Messages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has a discrete relevance for software safety, where it is highly essential to spot safety faults before they can be subjugated. V. Lima et al [18] have played a vital role in this regard by offering a formal V&V method for one of the most admired UML diagrams viz. sequence diagrams.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a discrete relevance for software safety, where it is highly essential to spot safety faults before they can be subjugated. V. Lima et al [18] have played a vital role in this regard by offering a formal V&V method for one of the most admired UML diagrams viz. sequence diagrams.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lima et al [72] verify UML 2.0 sequence diagrams by mapping each fragment into a process in PROMELA code where the send/receive event are specified by a communication between process. The security properties are specified using LTL temporal logic to be verified in SPIN.…”
Section: Verification Of Security Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class diagram and the operation contracts are thereby transformed into a constraint satisfaction problem, which is solved with respect to a set of consistency properties expressing, e.g., the applicability or the executability of an operation. A formal verification technique for UML 2.0 sequence diagrams employing linear temporal logic (LTL) formulas and the SPIN model checker [8] to reason about the occurrences of events is introduced by Lima et al [9]. In contrast to these single-diagram verification techniques, multi-view approaches assert the consistency across a set of diagrams.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%