2015
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2015.2398883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Verification and Synthesis for Discrete-Time Stochastic Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
140
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
140
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Case Study 1-2-3 (Sec. 4.1-4.3), we look at the special instance from [21], where the dynamics are autonomous (no actions) and linear: here T x is…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Case Study 1-2-3 (Sec. 4.1-4.3), we look at the special instance from [21], where the dynamics are autonomous (no actions) and linear: here T x is…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formal verification and strategy synthesis over shs are in general not decidable [4,28], and can be tackled via quantitative finite abstractions. These are precise approximations that come in two main different flavours: abstractions into mdp [4,26] and into imdp [21]. Once the finite abstractions are obtained, and with focus on specifications expressed in (non-nested) pctl or fragments of ltl [5], formal verification or strategy synthesis can be performed via probabilistic model checking tools, such as prism [20], storm [11], iscasMc [16].…”
Section: Formal Verification and Strategy Synthesis Via Abstractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, computing P I (Q i |= φ ) and P I (Q i |= φ ) amounts to finding the product Markov Chains induced by I ⊗ A that respectively minimize and maximize the probability of reaching an accepting state. Such reachability problems in IMCs have already been studied and solved when the destination states are fixed for all induced Markov Chains [9] [10]. However, the set of accepting and nonaccepting states may not be fixed in product IMCs and varies as a function of the assumed values for each transition.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have been extensively used in applications, including in robotics [4] and unmanned aircrafts [5]. Formal methods [6] are a means to verify the behavior of complex models against a rich set of specifications [7]. Linear temporal logic (LTL) is a particularly wellunderstood framework to express properties like safety, liveness, and priority [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%