2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab3d9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Solutions for Polarized Radiative Transfer. III. Stiffness and Instability

Abstract: Efficient numerical approximation of the polarized radiative transfer equation is challenging because this system of ordinary differential equations exhibits stiff behavior, which potentially results in numerical instability. This negatively impacts the accuracy of formal solvers, and small step-sizes are often necessary to retrieve physical solutions. This work presents stability analyses of formal solvers for the radiative transfer equation of polarized light, identifies instability issues, and suggests prac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…solver, the latter is exactly equivalent to a Hermite method (Auer 2003;Ibgui et al 2013). The accuracy of these methods has been recently analyzed in great detail for the polarized case by Janett et al (2017) and Janett & Paganini (2018). We found an unfortunate mistake in the transcription of the cubic Bezier integration coefficients reported by de la Cruz Rodríguez & Piskunov (2013).…”
Section: Formal Solution Of the Radiative Transfer Equationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…solver, the latter is exactly equivalent to a Hermite method (Auer 2003;Ibgui et al 2013). The accuracy of these methods has been recently analyzed in great detail for the polarized case by Janett et al (2017) and Janett & Paganini (2018). We found an unfortunate mistake in the transcription of the cubic Bezier integration coefficients reported by de la Cruz Rodríguez & Piskunov (2013).…”
Section: Formal Solution Of the Radiative Transfer Equationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Providing at least second-order accurate derivatives, both methods can reach fourth-order accuracy. Janett & Paganini (2018) demonstrated their proximity to L-stability. Similarly to the cubic Hermitian method, DELO-Bézier methods require the calculation of numerical derivatives that increases the total computational effort.…”
Section: Quadratic and Cubic Delo-bézier Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, Ibgui et al (2013) explained that the calculation of numerical derivatives proposed by Steffen (1990) is sensibly slower than the one proposed by Fritsch & Butland (1984). However, the derivatives provided by Fritsch & Butland (1984) are second-order accurate on uniform grids only and they drop to first-order accuracy on non-uniform grids (see Janett & Paganini 2018). For this reason, the version by Steffen (1990) is used here.…”
Section: Cubic Hermitian Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the problem cannot be reduced to simple quadratures (see Landi Degl 'Innocenti & Landolfi 2004). Moreover the radiative transfer equation for polarized light exhibits stiff behavior, and numerical schemes face instability issues (Janett & Paganini 2018). An extensive analysis of the numerical solution of the polarized radiative transfer equation is given by Janett et al (2017a,b), who characterized several exponential integrators (DELO methods) and high-order formal solvers.…”
Section: Polarized Radiative Transfer Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%