2017
DOI: 10.1109/tc.2016.2601328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Non-Fragile Stability Verification of Digital Control Systems with Uncertainty

Abstract: A verification methodology is described and evaluated to formally determine uncertain linear systems stability in digital controllers with considerations to the implementation aspects. In particular, this methodology is combined with the digital-system verifier (DSVerifier), which is a verification tool that employs Bounded Model Checking based on Satisfiability Modulo Theories to check the stability of digital control systems with uncertainty. DSVerifier determines the control system stability, considering al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertain model may be rewritten as a vector of coefficients in the z-domain using equation (8) as Ĝ = G + ∆p G. The parametric uncertainties in the plant are assumed to have the same order as the plant model, since errors of higher order can move the closed-loop poles by large amounts, thus preventing any given controller from stabilizing such a setup. This is a reasonable assumption since most tolerances do not change the architecture of the plant.…”
Section: Model Imprecision Finite Word Length Representation and Quamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The uncertain model may be rewritten as a vector of coefficients in the z-domain using equation (8) as Ĝ = G + ∆p G. The parametric uncertainties in the plant are assumed to have the same order as the plant model, since errors of higher order can move the closed-loop poles by large amounts, thus preventing any given controller from stabilizing such a setup. This is a reasonable assumption since most tolerances do not change the architecture of the plant.…”
Section: Model Imprecision Finite Word Length Representation and Quamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1. [8,15] Consider a feedback closed-loop control system as given in Figure 1 with a FWL implementation of the digital controllerC(z) = FM C ,N C I, F (C(z)) and uncertain discrete model of the plant from (6), (7)…”
Section: Closed-loop Stability Verification Under Parametric Uncertaimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our evaluation consists of 18 SISO control system benchmarks extracted from the literature [7], [8], [14], [15], [20]- [28], which include physical plants for an unmanned aerial Step Response Time (seconds) Amplitude Fig. 9:…”
Section: A Benchmark Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to detect the mentioned errors in digital systems, a model-checking procedure based on Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) has been proposed, named as Digital-System Verifier (DSVerifier) [6]. DSVerifier checks specific properties related to overflow, limit cycle, stability, and minimum-phase, in digitalsystem implementations [2], and also supports the verification of robust stability, considering parametric uncertainties for closed-loop systems represented by transfer functions [7]. Recently, DSVerifier was extended to support state-space systems, considering single-input single-output (SISO) and multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems [8], in order to verify violations in stability, controllability, observability, and quantization-error properties.…”
Section: Doimentioning
confidence: 99%