Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering 2016
DOI: 10.5220/0005937403960402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Methods in Collaborative Projects

Abstract: In this paper we address particular aspects of integration of formal methods in large-scale industrial projects, namely collaborative aspects. We review recent works addressing such aspects, identify some current trends and discuss directions for further research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [28,28] reviewing some recent large-scale industrial projects in which formal methods (including Focus ST ) have been successfully applied. The authors also covered some aspects of teaching formal methods for software engineering, including Focus ST , cf.…”
Section: Focus Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [28,28] reviewing some recent large-scale industrial projects in which formal methods (including Focus ST ) have been successfully applied. The authors also covered some aspects of teaching formal methods for software engineering, including Focus ST , cf.…”
Section: Focus Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [95] reviewing some recent large-scale industrial projects in which formal methods (including Focus and AutoFocus) have been successfully applied. The authors also covered some aspects of teaching formal methods for software engineering, including Focus and AutoFocus, cf.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is still unsolved now. Lack of readability and usability is one of the reasons for very limited use of FMs in industrial projects (Zamansky et al, 2016). However, in some cases even simply implementable improvements can make an FM more readable and understandable, cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%