2006
DOI: 10.1007/11734680_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Interpretation and Analysis of Collective Intelligence as Individual Intelligence

Abstract: Abstract. This paper addresses the question to what extent a process involving multiple agents that shows some form of collective intelligence can be interpreted as a single agent. The question is answered by formal analysis. It is shown for an example process how it can be conceptualised, formalised and simulated in two different manners: from a single agent (or cognitive) and from a multi-agent (or social) perspective. Moreover, it is shown how an ontological mapping can be formally defined between the two f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a next step, the authors are currently investigating to what extent collective processes such as ant behavior can be interpreted and formalized as single-agent processes. The first results of this research, including a formal mapping between a single-agent and a multiagent conceptualization, are described in Bosse and Treur [17]. Moreover, work is currently in progress to model other examples of the shared extended mind (outside the domain of ants).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a next step, the authors are currently investigating to what extent collective processes such as ant behavior can be interpreted and formalized as single-agent processes. The first results of this research, including a formal mapping between a single-agent and a multiagent conceptualization, are described in Bosse and Treur [17]. Moreover, work is currently in progress to model other examples of the shared extended mind (outside the domain of ants).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the isomorphism is embedding in one direction and is not a bidirectional isomorphism, simply because the observation state for m2 (and the same for the action a2) has no counterpart in the internal case. For a more detailed treatment of the isomorphism and an extension of the mapping to formally defined dynamic properties, see Bosse and Treur [17].…”
Section: C1mentioning
confidence: 99%