IECON 2020 the 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iecon43393.2020.9254717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Design Methodology for Discrete Proportional-Resonant (PR) Controllers Based on Sisotool/Matlab Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this diagram, the transfer functions G i v (s) and G v i (s) are defined as in ( 4) and ( 5), shown at the bottom of the next page, whereas C V (s) and C I (s) account for the transfer functions of the PR voltage and current controllers, respectively, where K PV , K PI , K RV and K RI are the proportional and resonant gain terms, and ω 0 is the resonant frequency: Tuner from Matlab. The design criteria was adopted following the guidelines in [25] with an outer voltage loop faster than the inner current loop in order to meet the design requirements. This feature improves the control by permitting a faster current tracking of the inner loop but avoiding any dangerous current overshoot, as the largest control action comes from the PR voltage controller output (i * L1 ).…”
Section: A Pr Cascade Dual Inner Loops Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this diagram, the transfer functions G i v (s) and G v i (s) are defined as in ( 4) and ( 5), shown at the bottom of the next page, whereas C V (s) and C I (s) account for the transfer functions of the PR voltage and current controllers, respectively, where K PV , K PI , K RV and K RI are the proportional and resonant gain terms, and ω 0 is the resonant frequency: Tuner from Matlab. The design criteria was adopted following the guidelines in [25] with an outer voltage loop faster than the inner current loop in order to meet the design requirements. This feature improves the control by permitting a faster current tracking of the inner loop but avoiding any dangerous current overshoot, as the largest control action comes from the PR voltage controller output (i * L1 ).…”
Section: A Pr Cascade Dual Inner Loops Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PR controller has gained its popularity and becomes widely used in single-phase systems [22]. And PR controller offers several advantages, such as resolving the computational burden and complexity due to the removal Park transformations, providing great convenience and simplicity to implement [23].…”
Section: B Design Of the Voltage Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportional-integral (PI) controllers in the dq frame and proportionalresonant (PR) controllers in the αβ frame are the most common. These controllers have a cascading architecture where the external control loop is the voltage control loop and the internal loop is the current control loop [4][5][6]. Another solution is to use optimal state feedback controllers such as LQR or LQI in the dq frame [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%