2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/rcis.2014.6861044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal approach for managing firewall misconfigurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to Table 5, the average ( ̅ ) of the five administrators' confidence for resolving ten scenarios of rule anomalies based on their skills for the traditional firewall is equal to 2.68; however, the average confidence of our proposed firewall which is a recommendation system based on probability is 4.16, which the confidence rate of the proposed firewall increased by 29.6% from the conventional firewall. In the case of evaluating reliability between raters, we apply Kappa statistics [19] in the equation (14) with the data from Table 5. The reliability value between the interraters of the conventional firewall is equal to 0.379, which means that the reliability is at a fair agreement as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Implementation and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Referring to Table 5, the average ( ̅ ) of the five administrators' confidence for resolving ten scenarios of rule anomalies based on their skills for the traditional firewall is equal to 2.68; however, the average confidence of our proposed firewall which is a recommendation system based on probability is 4.16, which the confidence rate of the proposed firewall increased by 29.6% from the conventional firewall. In the case of evaluating reliability between raters, we apply Kappa statistics [19] in the equation (14) with the data from Table 5. The reliability value between the interraters of the conventional firewall is equal to 0.379, which means that the reliability is at a fair agreement as shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Implementation and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They claimed that the processing time and number of packet hits are better than the traditional and FIREMAN [13] firewall. FPQE [14] is an automated system to resolve rule anomalies, which does not require any admin intervention. It uses an automatic rule removal in the case of redundancy and contradiction anomaly, and uses an automatic rule permutation against shadowing and correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firewall behaviour-based grouping [12] was also used to resolve conflicts with firewall rules, and the authors claim that the method takes less processing time and has higher packet matching than FIREMAN [13]. FPQE [14] is an automated method used to resolve rule conflicts without administrative intervention. The rules are corrected by deletion if they are detected as a redundant anomaly, but ruleswapping is applied when a shadowing or correlation anomaly is detected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%