2007
DOI: 10.1145/1317379.1317385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal analysis techniques for gossiping protocols

Abstract: We give a survey of formal verification techniques that can be used to corroborate existing experimental results for gossiping protocols in a rigorous manner. We present properties of interest for gossiping protocols and discuss how various formal evaluation techniques can be employed to predict them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1≤i≤n to S; this models the periodic task of the node i. 4 . Let us assume that all states of A i accept a transition with tick i ?.…”
Section: Predicates and Ltl Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1≤i≤n to S; this models the periodic task of the node i. 4 . Let us assume that all states of A i accept a transition with tick i ?.…”
Section: Predicates and Ltl Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions C2 and C3 hold, since there are only finitely many pairs of states, each of which has finitely many possible transitions per time step; see (4), (5), (6) where the domain of the distribution functions is required to be finite. For condition C3 note that the maximum multiplicity is bounded for all local transitions and this yields a global bound since there are only finitely many possible transitions.…”
Section: B Mean-field Convergence Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Straightforward analytical models are too large to be handled by model checkers (e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]). Abstracting away from details of a system can be an efficient approach to cope with the infamous state space explosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bakhshi et al [1] surveyed formal analysis techniques for gossiping protocols. Our evaluation metrics were influenced by a consistency count metric described by Kuenning et al [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%