2014 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/rtss.2014.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal Analysis of Timing Effects on Closed-Loop Properties of Control Software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the event of a system overload or transient error, a control algorithm may tolerate a bounded number of missed deadlines; however, the system requires a number of met deadlines to return to stable operation [19]. Typical Worst-Case Analysis [21] (TWCA) exploits the fact that such overload situations are rare and usually do not occur for consecutive executions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the event of a system overload or transient error, a control algorithm may tolerate a bounded number of missed deadlines; however, the system requires a number of met deadlines to return to stable operation [19]. Typical Worst-Case Analysis [21] (TWCA) exploits the fact that such overload situations are rare and usually do not occur for consecutive executions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of skips permitted and the number of subsequent deadlines that must be met (m − s) may be a requirement from the design of a control algorithm [19] or it may derive from physical properties of the system, for example with a radar altimeter it may be acceptable to drop some readings, but not to lose them altogether.…”
Section: Amc -Weakly Hardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued in Section 2, modern manufacturers are transitioning towards providing transient fault specifications for their sensors as that allows them to perform more sophisticated analysis [9]. However, if such a model is not provided or the sensor is operated in unfavorable environments (e.g., using a GPS while surrounded by tall buildings), it may be necessary to develop transient fault models based on empirical data.…”
Section: Transient Fault Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to classical bounded errors, manufacturers now provide transient fault specifications for their sensors [9], consisting of three dimensions: (1) the interval size, (2) window size and (3) the number of allowed faulty measurements per window. When such a specification is not provided, we note that intuitively there exists a range of interval sizes that match the underlying sensor noise model and a range that matches the underlying fault model, i.e., sometimes sensors provide measurements that are significantly farther from the true value than noisy ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the performance of an imaging application is still acceptable if once in a while a frame is lost or repeated [2]. Likewise the quality of a control application is still satisfactory if once in a while a sensor data sample is lost and the control algorithm is performed on an old sensor data sample [10]. Results from control engineering [4] could even show Lyapunov stability of the feedback control of an unstable plant that runs in open loop from time to time due to failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%