Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction 2008
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511814570.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Formal analysis of interactive systems: opportunities and weaknesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cognitive walkthrough as research method has recently been criticized for its tendency to focus on surface issues related to the interaction, overlooking more complex behavioral issues in the interaction between user and device [15]. However, for the purpose of this particular study, the objective is precisely to see if and how public schools manage to translate the spirit of the law into a public access of grades, regardless of complexity.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive walkthrough as research method has recently been criticized for its tendency to focus on surface issues related to the interaction, overlooking more complex behavioral issues in the interaction between user and device [15]. However, for the purpose of this particular study, the objective is precisely to see if and how public schools manage to translate the spirit of the law into a public access of grades, regardless of complexity.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These range from using graph theoretic concepts such as the shortest path between two vertices (which can be seen as defining the most efficient way a user can achieve a particular change of state), through testing relevant properties of the behavior of the system (as described by the graph), up to formal verification of such properties (c.f. using model checking [3]). …”
Section: Support For Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%