“…It appears that the field of Nutrition has not won its identity, relative autonomy, and desired strength [2,[4][5][6], "nor did it create its own evaluation criteria, more in line with the reality of the field" (Olinto et al, p.924) [6], remaining submissive to the main features of the hegemonic system of graduate evaluation, which is focused on quantitative criteria, indices of productivity, citation, visibility, and circulation of the produced knowledge [23][24][25][26][27][28], characteristics of Biomedical Sciences, Exact, and Natural.…”