2007
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0393-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Form factors in the radiative pion decay

Abstract: Abstract. We perform an analysis of the form factors that rule the structure-dependent amplitude in the radiative pion decay. The resonance contributions to π → e νeγ decays are computed through the proper construction of the vector and axial-vector form factors by setting the QCD driven asymptotic properties of the three-point Green functions V V P and V AP , and by demanding the smoothing of the form factors at high transfer of momentum. A comparison between theoretical and experimental determinations of the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
116
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed in [22], M V can be safely estimated by the mass of ρ(770) meson, while for the axialvector resonance, M A is apparently different from the mass of a 1 (1260) and M A = 0.998(49)GeV is obtained using the experiment value for the axial-vector form factor in [22]. Throughout this paper, we will use M V = M ρ and M A = 0.998GeV to evaluate resonance couplings, but masses appearing in the kinematics will take their values from [1].…”
Section: Phenomenological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed in [22], M V can be safely estimated by the mass of ρ(770) meson, while for the axialvector resonance, M A is apparently different from the mass of a 1 (1260) and M A = 0.998(49)GeV is obtained using the experiment value for the axial-vector form factor in [22]. Throughout this paper, we will use M V = M ρ and M A = 0.998GeV to evaluate resonance couplings, but masses appearing in the kinematics will take their values from [1].…”
Section: Phenomenological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Other parameters related to the heavier vector multiplet d m , d M , d s , will be fit later. Due to the inclusion of the new vector multiplet, some of the well established constraints in [15], such as d 1 + 8d 2 , d 3 , will get corrections [22]. However, since the combination of d 1 + 8d 2 is the coefficient of the mass of pseudoGoldstone mesons, the final results should be rather insensitive to the value of this combination.…”
Section: Phenomenological Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[30] from the study of the π → eν e γ decay, which yields M A = (998 ± 49) MeV. We cannot use the information coming from Γ(ρ → 2π) = (149.4 ± 1.0) MeV [29] in order to determine M A , since G V is constrained by eq.…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%