1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(97)00338-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Form error evaluation using L1-approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (5) is equivalent to the following: (8) Moreover, let and denote the matrices constructed by the remaining rows of and which are not included in and , respectively. The complete system in (7) [or (6)] can be written as follows: (9) Suppose that a few samples have been taken. We introduce a wavelet-based interpolating scheme which interpolates the sampled points and adopts the minimum energy principle.…”
Section: Wavelet-based Random Curve Interpolating Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The (5) is equivalent to the following: (8) Moreover, let and denote the matrices constructed by the remaining rows of and which are not included in and , respectively. The complete system in (7) [or (6)] can be written as follows: (9) Suppose that a few samples have been taken. We introduce a wavelet-based interpolating scheme which interpolates the sampled points and adopts the minimum energy principle.…”
Section: Wavelet-based Random Curve Interpolating Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OLS method fits an ideal feature to CMM data by minimizing the sum of squared orthogonal residuals and uses the range of the resulting orthogonal residuals to estimate the form error. Some variants of the OLS method have been also proposed for more robust estimation of the form error in the presence of measurement outliers [7]- [9]. The MZ method finds the maximum inscribing and minimum circumscribing features that bound all the CMM data and uses the orthogonal width to estimate the form error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most papers surveyed in Dowling et al (1997) provided algorithms to realize the two ideas for various kinds of geometric features. Dowling et al (1997) also discussed some variants of the OLS method, which use a different objective function, e.g., the least average deviation used in Shunmugam (1987Shunmugam ( , 1991 and Namboothiri and Shunmugam (1998), which is supposed to be more robust in the presence of measurement outliers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%