2017
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2017.82.034413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fork Protection and Therapy Resistance in Hereditary Breast Cancer

Abstract: The BRCA-Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway preserves the genome and suppresses cancer and is a main determinant of chemotherapeutic efficacy. The hereditary breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 function in DNA double-strand break repair mediating distinct steps of homologous recombination (HR). More recently, independent of DNA repair, functions in the replication stress response have come to light, providing insight as to how the BRCA-FA pathway also balances genome preservation with proliferation. The BRCA-FA prote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(162 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells, MRE11-dependent nucleolytic processing of reversed forks leads to fork degradation ( Schlacher et al, 2011 ; Schlacher et al, 2012 ). Preventing fork reversal through depletion of fork remodelers such as SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, or helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF) restores fork protection to BRCA1 and BRCA2-deficient cells and in some cases improves resistance to stress-inducing agents ( Kolinjivadi et al, 2017 ; Taglialatela et al, 2017 ; Cantor and Calvo, 2017 ; Mijic et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient cells, MRE11-dependent nucleolytic processing of reversed forks leads to fork degradation ( Schlacher et al, 2011 ; Schlacher et al, 2012 ). Preventing fork reversal through depletion of fork remodelers such as SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, or helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF) restores fork protection to BRCA1 and BRCA2-deficient cells and in some cases improves resistance to stress-inducing agents ( Kolinjivadi et al, 2017 ; Taglialatela et al, 2017 ; Cantor and Calvo, 2017 ; Mijic et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, DNA crosslinks do not appear to initially cause replication forks to collapse and can be bypassed (8,9). Moreover, in the majority of genetic models currently reported, restored FP fails to restore cisplatin resistance, suggesting the cisplatin lesions do not collapse forks, and therefore calls into question how cisplatin crosslinks could be converted into DSBs (4,10). Most saliently, indicating that the fundamental sensitizing lesion may in fact not be a DSB, reports indicate even HR proficient cells can nevertheless display hypersensitivity to cisplatin and other genotoxic agents (11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, recent findings indicate that cisplatin toxicity in triple negative breast cancer is unrelated to loss of DNA repair factors (Heijink et al, 2019). In addition, in several distinct models restored FP fails to restore cisplatin resistance, suggesting FP is uncoupled from the mechanism of resistance (Feng and Jasin, 2017) (Cantor and Calvo, 2018). Most saliently, indicating that the underlying sensitizing lesion may in fact not be a DSB, HR proficient cells show cisplatin hypersensitivity (Wang et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%