Forgoing Artificial Nutrition or Hydration in Patients Nearing Death in Six European Countries

Abstract

Whether or not artificial nutrition or hydration (ANH) may be forgone in terminally ill patients has been the subject of medical and ethical discussions. Information about the frequency and background characteristics of making decisions to forgo ANH is generally limited to specific clinical settings. The aim of this study was to compare the practice of forgoing ANH in six European countries: Belgium, Denmark, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. In each country, random samples were drawn from death registries. Subsequently, the reporting physician received a questionnaire about the medical decisions that preceded the patient's death. The total number of deaths studied was 20,480. The percentage of all deaths that were preceded by a decision to forgo ANH varied from 2.6% in Italy to 10.9% in The Netherlands. In most countries, decisions to forgo ANH were more frequently made for female patients, patients aged 80 years or older, and for patients who died of a malignancy or disease of the nervous system (including dementia). Of patients in whom ANH was forgone, 67%-93% were incompetent. Patients in whom ANH was forgone did not receive more potentially life-shortening drugs to relieve symptoms than other patients for whom other end-of-life decisions had been made. Decisions to forgo ANH are made in a substantial percentage of terminally ill patients. Providing all patients who are in the terminal stage of a lethal disease with ANH does not seem to be a widely accepted standard among physicians in Western Europe.

Attitudes toward end-of-life situations other than euthanasia and assisted suicide among Portuguese oncologists

“…Those issues have been studied in several countries [1][2][3][4][5]. For example, in Holland, in a famous study sponsored by the Dutch government [2] on acts that terminate life, it was observed that the administration of drugs in lethal doses without explicit request from the patients occurred in 0.8% of all deaths.…”

Critical Decisions for Older People With Advanced Dementia: A Prospective Study in Long-Term Institutions and District Home Care

“…10 Few studies have described the range of CDs for this population, and most focused on specific decisions. 11,12 Little is known about the purposes of this kind of decisions for patients with advanced dementia. However, some papers [13][14][15][16][17] analyzed end-of-life decisions in different countries retrospectively interviewing the physicians who had cared for the deceased person.…”

A national survey of Italian physicians’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions following the death of Eluana Englaro

“…The first result reported was that Italian doctors had the least experience in end-of-life decisions in comparison with colleagues of other European countries; this is probably due to the absence of definite rules not only about attending to a dying person but also with regard to donor transplantation and in general to the value of a patient's autonomy in such situations [37][38][39]. According to these observations, our preliminary data emphasized that decisions regarding patients on life-sustaining treatment is a controversial topic in Italy.…”

“…Onwuteaka-Philipsen pointed out that, in Italy, the sanctity of life is considered more important than quality of life, and patients would be reluctant to request withholding and withdrawing therapy because they may be influenced by the negative opinion of physicians regarding such a decision [48]. The reason given was that ''this would presumably upset the public opinion'' [36,39]. Giannini also underscored this point.…”