2017
DOI: 10.14687/jhs.v14i1.3578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgiveness flexibility scale for secondary education: Validity and reliability study<p>Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinde affetme esnekliği ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması

Abstract: The aim of the study is to develop a scale which determines forgiveness flexibility level of secondary education students and to test reliability and validity of the scale. The study was actualized with 651 secondary education students. As result of exploratory factor analysis, which was used to test structure validity of the scale, a structure which explains 45.5% variance of total scale was attained. According to results of exploratory factor analysis, total 14 items collected at three factors. Factors were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale is a five-point Likert type. The scale consists of 3 sub-dimensions: recognition (1,5,8,12), internalization (2,3,6,7,14), and application (4,9,10,11,13,15). Items in the recognition sub-dimension are scored in reverse.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale is a five-point Likert type. The scale consists of 3 sub-dimensions: recognition (1,5,8,12), internalization (2,3,6,7,14), and application (4,9,10,11,13,15). Items in the recognition sub-dimension are scored in reverse.…”
Section: Data Collection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the Forgiveness Flexibility Scale, developed by Çolak, Koç, Eker, and Düşünceli (2017), along with the Forgiveness Scale devised by Ersanlı and Vural-Batik (2015), and the Trait Forgiveness Scale, originated by Berry, Worthington, O'Connor, Parrot III, and Wade (2005), and later adapted into Turkish by Akın, Akın, and Gediksiz (2012), each found application in a singular instance.…”
Section: Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu çalışmalardan ikisi affetme esnekliğini genç yetişkinlik dönemi açısından ele alarak psikoeğitim ve grupla psikolojik danışma uygulamalarının affetme esnekliği kazandırmadaki etkililiğini test ederken (Karakaş, 2014;Çolak 2014); çalışmalardan biri affetme esnekliği ile manevi zekâ, iç yönelimli dindarlık ve öznel iyi oluş kavramları arasındaki ilişkileri incelemiştir (Karataş, 2014). Ergen örnekleminde gerçekleştirilen bir çalışmada ise, bilişsel davranışçı yönelimli grupla psikolojik danışmanın lise öğrencilerinin umutsuzluğunun azalmasına katkı sağladığı belirlenmiştir (Eker, 2017). Ancak affetme esnekliğinin ergenlerin iyi oluşu üzerinde nasıl bir etki ortaya çıkardığını ele alan herhangi bir ilişkisel çalışmaya rastlanmamıştır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified