1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(98)00092-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forging and heading of hollow spur gear forms: an analysis and some experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The trends of all studies are similar except slip-line field analysis (Tomov et al, 1999). Neglecting the effect of pressure angle, the upper bound analysis done by Chitkara and Bhutta (1999) is also compared in that figure. Again, they said their results estimated by upper bound are lower than those observed experimentally towards the end of the deformation.…”
Section: A New Simplified Formula For Relative Forging Pressurementioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The trends of all studies are similar except slip-line field analysis (Tomov et al, 1999). Neglecting the effect of pressure angle, the upper bound analysis done by Chitkara and Bhutta (1999) is also compared in that figure. Again, they said their results estimated by upper bound are lower than those observed experimentally towards the end of the deformation.…”
Section: A New Simplified Formula For Relative Forging Pressurementioning
confidence: 78%
“…They described filling of the die cavity is "fairly" satisfactory (gear teeth seem chamfered along the bottom edges) in their study. Complete filling of the die cavity increases relative forging pressure exponentially and due to that, the results of the suggested formula (Equation 15) are higher than Chitkara and Bhutta (1999).…”
Section: A New Simplified Formula For Relative Forging Pressurementioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations