Forging a Diagonal Instrument for the Global Left: The Vessel

Abstract

This article takes up Samir Amin’s challenge to rethink the issue of global political organization by proposing the building of a diagonal political organization for the Global Left that would link local, national and world regional and global networks and prefigurational communities to coordinate contention for power in the world-system during the next few decades of the 21st century. The World Social Forum (WSF) process needs to be reinvented for the current period of rising neo-fascist and populist reactionary nationalism and to foster the emergence of a capable instrument that can confront and contend with the global power structure of world capitalism and aid local and national struggles. This will involve overcoming the fragmentation of progressive movements that have been an outcome of the rise of possessive individualism, the precariat, and social media. We propose a holistic approach to organizing a vessel for the global left based on struggles for climate justice, human rights, anti-racism, queer rights, feminism, sharing networks, peace alliances, taking back the city, progressive nationalism and confronting and defeating neo-fascism and new forms of conservative populism.

Making Other Worlds Possible: The Battle in Seattle in World-Historical Context

“…In fact, we can extend our historical lens to link contemporary movements to centuries-old struggles over rights and land. A broader, world-historical viewpoint tells a story about collective work to enact a political project of grounding globalization in people's everyday experiences and in places, a process others have called "deglobalization" (Álvarez and Chase-Dunn 2019, Bello 2003, Chase-Dunn 2005. Another term used to describe at least some of deglobalization's key elements is decolonization, which highlights efforts to reorganize historically defined power structures and social relations.…”

Cyclical Evolution of the Global Right

“…Most neofascist movements do not regurgitate the rhetoric of the early twentieth century fascist movements. Instead they are shaped by the contemporary socio‐political‐economic context (Alvarez and Chase‐Dunn ; Paxton ). Neofascist movements have not (yet) been as violent, and nor have they glorified violence, as much their twentieth‐century predecessors.…”