Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2695664.2695820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forgetting methods for incremental matrix factorization in recommender systems

Abstract: Numerous stream mining algorithms are equipped with forgetting mechanisms, such as sliding windows or fading factors, to make them adaptive to changes. In recommender systems those techniques have not been investigated thoroughly despite the very volatile nature of users' preferences that they deal with. We developed five new forgetting techniques for incremental matrix factorization in recommender systems. We show on eight datasets that our techniques improve the predictive power of recommender systems. Exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We not only experiment with time and rating-and-position based forgetting techniques, using individual fixed-size rating queues, but, additionally, apply fading both to the viewer model and to the viewer rating queue. Our results and those of Matuszyk (2015) [4] show that fading outperforms the sliding window results.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We not only experiment with time and rating-and-position based forgetting techniques, using individual fixed-size rating queues, but, additionally, apply fading both to the viewer model and to the viewer rating queue. Our results and those of Matuszyk (2015) [4] show that fading outperforms the sliding window results.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Live viewer profiling is typically performed using sliding windows ( [3,5]) or factor fading ( [4]) together with incremental matrix factorization. In particular, sliding windows are FIFO queues of dynamic or fixed size representing a number of viewer events [3] or a time span [5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the metrics naturally follows the type of data: precision, recall, F1, DCG, and MAP for positive‐only data, and RMSE and MAE for ratings. Two exceptions to this are Refs and that use Precision/Recall to evaluate recommmendations obtained with ratings data. One contribution uses an ad hoc, nonstandard accuracy metric.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref , Matuszyk and Spiliopoulou proposed and evaluated several selective forgetting strategies for incremental MF algorithms with ratings data. In Ref , Matuszyk et al extended the study with several other forgetting methods and tested them with positive‐only data in addition to ratings data. In both publications, the authors show that selectively forgetting some of the past users' feedback is beneficial to the system.…”
Section: Cf and Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented three main approaches: (i ) the static approach [2,8,1], which creates the SVD model off-line; (ii ) the global adaptive approach [13,12,7], which builds the initial SVD model off-line and applies SGD for incremental on-line update; and (iii) our individual adaptive approach, which generates the initial SVD model off-line, and uses personalised learning and over-fitting parameters with the on-line SGD incremental update. The three approaches were applied to the rating and positive feedback scenarios.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%