2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-022-01239-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forever young: arrested succession in communities subjected to recurrent fires in a lowland tropical forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, there is no doubt about the fire potential to degrade tropical forests relative to biodiversity persistence (Barlow & Peres 2008), aboveground forest biomass (Brando et al 2020) and related ecosystems services, although the magnitude of such effects is still to be completely documented. However, the connections between forest degradation, multiple ecosystem services, and social reproduction/empowering of traditional communities in the Amazon require urgent attention since (1) wildfires are likely to occur in the same frequency intense droughts occur (Barlow et al 2020), (2) burned forest are more prone to subsequent intense fire events; that is, surface fires moving to canopy fires, (3) forest regeneration following severe damages can experience arrested succession due to a combination of drivers including elevated seedling and tree mortality, seed dispersal limitation, and grass invasion, and (4) forest persistence, integrity and even land tenure status depend in a large extent on the social reproduction of locals and their effective/direct engagement into the wildfire agenda (see Balch et al 2013; Carmenta et al 2016; Flores et al 2021; Canoa et al 2022; Mata et al 2022). As stated before, forest degradation has already exceeded deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (Matricardi et al 2020).…”
Section: Addressing Forest Fires Via An Integrated Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there is no doubt about the fire potential to degrade tropical forests relative to biodiversity persistence (Barlow & Peres 2008), aboveground forest biomass (Brando et al 2020) and related ecosystems services, although the magnitude of such effects is still to be completely documented. However, the connections between forest degradation, multiple ecosystem services, and social reproduction/empowering of traditional communities in the Amazon require urgent attention since (1) wildfires are likely to occur in the same frequency intense droughts occur (Barlow et al 2020), (2) burned forest are more prone to subsequent intense fire events; that is, surface fires moving to canopy fires, (3) forest regeneration following severe damages can experience arrested succession due to a combination of drivers including elevated seedling and tree mortality, seed dispersal limitation, and grass invasion, and (4) forest persistence, integrity and even land tenure status depend in a large extent on the social reproduction of locals and their effective/direct engagement into the wildfire agenda (see Balch et al 2013; Carmenta et al 2016; Flores et al 2021; Canoa et al 2022; Mata et al 2022). As stated before, forest degradation has already exceeded deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon (Matricardi et al 2020).…”
Section: Addressing Forest Fires Via An Integrated Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some forest fragments, these impacts can initiate the process of biotic homogenization and forest secondarization (although both phenomena are independent and happen in different ways: Nobre et al, 1991;Salazar et al, 2007;Nobre and Borma, 2009;Flores et al, 2016;Veldman and Putz, 2011;Staal et al, 2018), i. e. high proportion of species requiring undisturbed forest tend to experience intense degradation of their forest habitats, while secondary forest stands face a form of arrested succession supporting impoverished communities (Jolly et al, 2015;Mata et al, 2022). In general, it is verified higher species richness, diversity and basal area for unburned sites and lowest for recurrent burned areas in Amazon forests (Mena et al, 2020;Prestes et al, 2020).…”
Section: Floristic and Phytosociological Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the importance of the Atlantic Forest and its potential threat to fires, studies on the impacts of disturbances such as fires over these ecosystems are scarce (Guedes et al, 2020;Sansevero et al, 2020;Mata et al, 2022). Thus, the objective of our study is to contribute to filling this knowledge gap by investigating how fire shapes composition, diversity, structure and functioning of the Atlantic Forest.…”
Section: Floristic and Phytosociological Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By resprouting and dispersing into burnt patches, grasses and shrubs reinforce their dominance in fire‐disturbed habitats (Paula et al., 2016; Simpson et al., 2016). In many degraded landscapes, this leads to positive fire‐vegetation feedbacks, which may create ‘fire traps’ that perpetuate early successional vegetation in areas where the climate supports closed‐canopy forests (Bell, 1984; Flores et al., 2016; Hoffmann, Geiger, et al., 2012; Mata et al., 2022; Staal et al., 2018; Van Nes et al., 2018). These effects are further compounded by the abundance of anthropogenic ignition sources (Cochrane, 2003; Tien Bui et al., 2016) and stronger droughts under climate change (Clarke et al., 2022; Hoffmann et al., 2003; Lizundia‐Loiola et al., 2020; Seidl et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire susceptibility and post‐fire recovery in the wet tropics and subtropics are currently understudied. Despite evidence showing that degraded sites in the wet tropics are reasonably fire‐prone (Flores et al., 2016; Mata et al., 2022; Uhl et al., 1988), there is still a prevailing perception of these bioregions being ‘too wet to burn’. Existing studies on fire dynamics continue to focus on naturally fire‐adapted Mediterranean, boreal and Savanna ecosystems (Kibler et al., 2019; Kurbanov et al., 2022; Mallek et al., 2013; Qiu et al., 2021; van Butsic, Kelly and Moritz, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%