2021
DOI: 10.3375/043.041.0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Vegetation Response to White-Tailed Deer Population Reductions in a Large Urban Park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller hull size of the 2021 woody stem community indicates monitoring sites are becoming more similar to each other than those in 1992 for woody stem composition (Figure 3). The woody stem community after 1992 showed a greater association with species known to benefit from deer exclusion including red ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica ), and eastern white cedar (Bradshaw and Waller 2016, Jenkins and Howard 2021). In the NMDS analysis of the vegetation cover dataset (Figure 4), the composition was also slow to change within the first 5 sampling years (i.e., 1992–1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smaller hull size of the 2021 woody stem community indicates monitoring sites are becoming more similar to each other than those in 1992 for woody stem composition (Figure 3). The woody stem community after 1992 showed a greater association with species known to benefit from deer exclusion including red ash ( Fraxinus pennsylvanica ), and eastern white cedar (Bradshaw and Waller 2016, Jenkins and Howard 2021). In the NMDS analysis of the vegetation cover dataset (Figure 4), the composition was also slow to change within the first 5 sampling years (i.e., 1992–1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of widespread regeneration debt across the study area has implications for forest managers across the region facing similar regeneration debt and excessive DBIs (e.g., see Blossey et al, 2019; Jenkins & Howard, 2021; Kilheffer et al, 2019). The regeneration debt index can help managers determine when intervention is necessary (i.e., classified as imminent or probable failure) and evaluate forest response to management over time, as we have shown with parks undergoing deer management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on forage nutritional content and preference by white‐tailed deer, utilization of different plant species including in settings protected and unprotected from herbivory, and plant distributions and characteristics (e.g., flowering frequency) along gradients of deer abundance has identified sets of indicator plant species sensitive to high deer populations (Russell et al 2001, Kirschbaum and Anacker 2005, Jenkins and Howard 2021). Examples of indicator plants widely applicable in eastern North American forests include certain species of tree seedlings, several species in the Liliaceae family, and certain groups of forbs not necessarily most palatable to deer but that commonly decline where deer are abundant (Williams et al 2000, Frankland and Nelson 2003, Shelton et al 2014).…”
Section: Studya Location Pre‐cull (Deer/km2) Post‐cull (Deer/km2) Dur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the main strategies for managing abundant deer on contemporary landscapes in an ecological management context include constructing fencing to exclude deer from variously sized areas (exclosures) and regulating deer populations via culling through controlled hunting (Ward and Williams 2020, Jenkins and Howard 2021, Nagy et al 2022). Exclosures provide deer‐free refugia and express plant community change in the absence of deer herbivory (Russell et al 2001).…”
Section: Studya Location Pre‐cull (Deer/km2) Post‐cull (Deer/km2) Dur...mentioning
confidence: 99%