1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00240202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
408
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(426 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
17
408
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is possible that continued recruitment may raise seedling density levels, it is unlikely to be substantial. Post-fire seedling establishment in subalpine forests is accomplished rapidly from local seed sources (Peet 1981, Jenkins et al 1997, Antos and Parish 2002. Aging of the seedlings surveyed via node counts indicates that recruitment rates have dropped dramatically on all three coniferous species, which all peaked three to four years post-fire.…”
Section: Implications Of Exceeding Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is possible that continued recruitment may raise seedling density levels, it is unlikely to be substantial. Post-fire seedling establishment in subalpine forests is accomplished rapidly from local seed sources (Peet 1981, Jenkins et al 1997, Antos and Parish 2002. Aging of the seedlings surveyed via node counts indicates that recruitment rates have dropped dramatically on all three coniferous species, which all peaked three to four years post-fire.…”
Section: Implications Of Exceeding Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest distribution in the Colorado Front Range is influenced by combinations of topographic and moisture gradients [21]. The general pattern is foothill shrublands dominated by mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus) at the lowest elevations which transitions to open montane forests dominated by ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa var.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The western portion of the study area is mostly in the Mount Evans Wilderness Area on the Arapaho and Pike National Forests with the east portion largely private property with isolated public land units. Field observation, prior research on forest distribution [21] and current, GIS-based existing vegetation type maps [23] all aided in identifying the five vegetation types and associated 200 m elevation sampling bands (Figure 1). Figure 1.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No disturbances were used for these runs, as the internal dynamics (that is, the endogenous factors) of the system were the primary focus of this study. The composition of the forest community at year 500 for each elevation was compared to that observed on typical mountainsides in the Rocky Mountains (Marr 1961;Peet 1981).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%