2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest tree species discrimination in western Himalaya using EO-1 Hyperion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, several authors investigated the ability to identify tree species using airborne hyperspectral imagery [27][28][29][30], LiDAR data [31] or a combination of multiple sources [32][33][34][35]. Spectral variability between species related to differences in biochemical properties are better preserved using hyperspectral data which allow continuous sampling of the electromagnetic spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, several authors investigated the ability to identify tree species using airborne hyperspectral imagery [27][28][29][30], LiDAR data [31] or a combination of multiple sources [32][33][34][35]. Spectral variability between species related to differences in biochemical properties are better preserved using hyperspectral data which allow continuous sampling of the electromagnetic spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works [e.g. Pignatti et al, 2009;Petropoulos et al, 2012;George et al, 2014] have highlighted the usefulness of hyperspectral satellite imagery to improve forest cover classification. However, the experimental trials have resulted in low classification accuracy (even lower than 70% in some cases), not suitable for operative uses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many of the 242 bands of Hyperion are not usable for the classification due to high noise ratio [George et al, 2014], a pre-processing phase was applied [Petropoulos et al, 2012]. In the first step, the Level 1 L1T GeoTIFF Hyperion imagery was converted into ENVI format files using the Hyperion_tools.sav toolkit available in ENVI image processing environment [ITT Visual Information Solutions, 2008].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check whether any important information was lost by the selected optimum bands, the SVM classification results obtained using the selected optimal bands were compared to that obtained using all bands, according to [42]. For TG-1, the classification map using 17 bands matched 94.72% with the classification map using 111 bands; for Hyperion, the classification map using 27 bands matched 96.03% with the classification map using 158 bands.…”
Section: Dimensionality Reduction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%