2002
DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2002.s1.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest soil conditions in the CONECOFOR Permanent Monitoring Plots and in the Level I Network in Italy

Abstract: The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil chemistry. A number of soil variables was measured for soil organic and mineral layers at the CONECOFOR plots in 1995-1996 (Alianiello et al, 2000). For the present study, the top mineral layer (0-10 cm) was considered; topsoil layers are likely to show short-term responses to atmospheric input, while organic layers are in general too thin and variable in most Italian forest soils (Andreetta et al, 2010).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil chemistry. A number of soil variables was measured for soil organic and mineral layers at the CONECOFOR plots in 1995-1996 (Alianiello et al, 2000). For the present study, the top mineral layer (0-10 cm) was considered; topsoil layers are likely to show short-term responses to atmospheric input, while organic layers are in general too thin and variable in most Italian forest soils (Andreetta et al, 2010).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil composition was examined in 70 plots of the Level I investigation, including 20 CONECOFOR PMPs (Alianiello et al 2002). Results reveal no soils with pH <3 and few with pH values between 3.0-3.5; furthermore, the soils with low pH are naturally acid, due to their parent material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%