2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00607.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest responses to the large‐scale east coast fires in Korea

Abstract: The east coast forest fires of April 2000 were Korea's largest recorded fires. This, along with the fact that they took place in the region most frequently affected by fire, attracted a great deal of attention. Due to the variations in wind, topography and pre-fire forest stands, a heterogeneous landscape mosaic of burn severity was created across the region. It turned out to be an excellent opportunity to study various landscape-scale impacts of fires on forest dynamics. Therefore, we investigated stands in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above categorization agrees with expert knowledge (González et al, 2007b) and with observation of the effects of forest composition and structure on burn probability and severity. Deciduous forests -classified here in fire hazard groups 1 and 2 -burn less than expected in relation to their availability in the landscape, in NW Portugal (Moreira et al, 2001) and elsewhere (Cumming, 2001), and experience lower fire severity than the conifer stands in their vicinity (Choung et al, 2004;Hély et al, 2003;Wang, 2002). The burn probability of closed and low deciduous stands (included in group 2) in Portugal decreases with their patch size (Godinho-Ferreira et al, 2006), which is suggestive of an unfavourable environment for fire spread.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above categorization agrees with expert knowledge (González et al, 2007b) and with observation of the effects of forest composition and structure on burn probability and severity. Deciduous forests -classified here in fire hazard groups 1 and 2 -burn less than expected in relation to their availability in the landscape, in NW Portugal (Moreira et al, 2001) and elsewhere (Cumming, 2001), and experience lower fire severity than the conifer stands in their vicinity (Choung et al, 2004;Hély et al, 2003;Wang, 2002). The burn probability of closed and low deciduous stands (included in group 2) in Portugal decreases with their patch size (Godinho-Ferreira et al, 2006), which is suggestive of an unfavourable environment for fire spread.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is based on signs of selective logging for certain species and scattered clumps that have regenerated via sprouting. Fires might have been a threat in the past; however, at present it probably is not true in that park because the most common species on that mountain have proven to be highly resistant (Choung et al 2004). Furthermore, these forests have been protected by rigorous forest management policies since the 1970s (Odaesan National Park Service 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas are officially classified as environmental conservation forests and have the ability to naturally regenerate from the intact canopy. Passive restoration should avoid drastic changes to their forest structure [36]. Generally, passive restoration methods can be used for oak forests in Korea [4,20] because fire-damaged oaks can regenerate from their root sprouts and seeds.…”
Section: Long-term Restorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, burned areas near former pine mushroom production sites should be reforested to reintroduce pine mushrooms for forest owners [4]. Passive and active restorations can be applied in a balanced way, depending on the site quality and vegetation conditions [20,36]. For active restoration, native and local tree seedlings can grow under similar weather conditions and site qualities.…”
Section: Review On the Current Post-fire Forest Restoration Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation