2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest relevant targets in EU policy instruments - can progress be measured by the pan-European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such targets or thresholds are politically sensitive and difficult to homogenize on country levels across, in particular if they become normative. Indeed, there is criticism voiced that C&I fail to facilitate such assessments [41], but there also needs to be clarity on the original purpose and design of C&I [9,42]. It is important to understand that the Pan-European C&I for SFM are the outcome of a voluntary political process and hence differ from scientific indicator concepts such as critical loads or critical levels.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Targets or Thresholds As Tools For Assessments Of Sfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such targets or thresholds are politically sensitive and difficult to homogenize on country levels across, in particular if they become normative. Indeed, there is criticism voiced that C&I fail to facilitate such assessments [41], but there also needs to be clarity on the original purpose and design of C&I [9,42]. It is important to understand that the Pan-European C&I for SFM are the outcome of a voluntary political process and hence differ from scientific indicator concepts such as critical loads or critical levels.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Targets or Thresholds As Tools For Assessments Of Sfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the countries have 30-45% of their land area covered with forests, while countries in northern Europe have larger forest areas, with three-quarters of the total land area in Finland and 69% in Sweden being covered by forests. The forest sector, consisting of the wood and paper industries contributes 1.97% of the total gross domestic product (GDP) in northern Europe and on average 0.72% of the total GDP of Europe [1,2]. Pests and diseases have been reported as important causes of damage among wildlife and grazing by domestic animals, fires and weather extremes, such as storms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest industry, seed producers, nurseries, producers of nontimber products and the broader society are end-users of forests and urban green areas as providers of multiple ecosystem services. The need of indicators to provide information on forest ecosystem health and vitality, which may enable an evaluation of its resilience, is clearly underlined [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the countries have 30 -45% of their land area covered with forests, while countries in the North Europe have larger forest areas, with three-quarters of the total land area in Finland and 69% in Sweden being covered by forests. The forest sector consisting of wood industry and paper industry contributes 1.97% to total gross domestic product (GDP) in North Europe and on average 0.72% to the total GDP of Europe [1,2]. Pests and diseases were reported as important causes of damage among wildlife and grazing by domestic animals, fires and weather extremes such as storms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forest industry, the seed producers, nurseries, producers of non-timber birch and spruces products, the broader society are end-users of forests and urban green areas as providers of multiple ecosystem services. The need of indicators to provide information on forest ecosystem health and vitality -which may make possible an evaluation of its resilience -is clearly undelined [2]. Healthy trees and healthy forests is translated into forests providing better regulating services (associated with natural catastrophes), better maintenance/habitat services (increased biodiversity) and better multiple ecosystem services (affecting humans and animals).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%