2013
DOI: 10.1080/10042857.2013.868576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest protected area governance in Bangladesh: a focus on the legal and policy framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Communication gaps created by differences in various stakeholders levels of education and awareness of co-management and tourism was identified in this study as one of those challenges (Chowdhury & Izumiyama, 2014;Chowdhury & Koike, 2010;Mukul, Uddin, Uddin, Khan, & Marzan, 2008;Rashid, Craig, Jeffery, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Challenges In Tourism Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Communication gaps created by differences in various stakeholders levels of education and awareness of co-management and tourism was identified in this study as one of those challenges (Chowdhury & Izumiyama, 2014;Chowdhury & Koike, 2010;Mukul, Uddin, Uddin, Khan, & Marzan, 2008;Rashid, Craig, Jeffery, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Challenges In Tourism Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the success of a sound management and planning process is dependent upon the effective and regular participation of the different stakeholders of protected areas (including the local communities) (Colfer, 2005), traditional protected area management approaches often fail to consider the wide range of stakeholders involved in the area (Tosun, 2000(Tosun, , 2001). Other problems also associated with traditional protected area management approaches, which take a top-down management structure, include: tangled goals; faulty implementation plans that lack proper representation of the local stakeholders; conflicts in terms of imbalanced power and trust between stakeholder groups; low transparency and accountability; disregard of local culture and institutions, insufficient linking of knowledge; and weak institutional capacity (Chernela, 2003;Christie & White, 2007;Glaser, Baitoningsih, Ferse, Neil, & Deswandi, 2010;Jaireth & Smyth, 2003;Phillips, 2003;Rashid, Craig, Jeffery, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Research Context and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations