2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest management decision support for evaluating forest protection effects against rockfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Four different phenomena have been identified in the physical effect of forest structures on the dynamics of fallen boulders: (a) kinetic energy absorption through direct impact between a boulder and a trunk, Gsteiger (1989), Zinggeler (1989), Stokes et al (2005), Brauner (2005), , Lundström et al (2007Lundström et al ( , 2009 kinetic energy absorption through interaction between a rock and shrub vegetation, (c) increasing rugosity of slope and a consequent reduction of coefficient restitution, Jones et al (2000), (d) the positive effect of forest vegetation on geotechnical soil characteristics, Pfeiffer (1989). The theoretical energy dissipated by forest structures depends on the number of tree/boulder impacts and on the kinetic energy dissipated by a single impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Four different phenomena have been identified in the physical effect of forest structures on the dynamics of fallen boulders: (a) kinetic energy absorption through direct impact between a boulder and a trunk, Gsteiger (1989), Zinggeler (1989), Stokes et al (2005), Brauner (2005), , Lundström et al (2007Lundström et al ( , 2009 kinetic energy absorption through interaction between a rock and shrub vegetation, (c) increasing rugosity of slope and a consequent reduction of coefficient restitution, Jones et al (2000), (d) the positive effect of forest vegetation on geotechnical soil characteristics, Pfeiffer (1989). The theoretical energy dissipated by forest structures depends on the number of tree/boulder impacts and on the kinetic energy dissipated by a single impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dorren et al (2007) summarised as follows the methods proposed in the literature to quantify energy absorption during tree/boulder impact: (a) Couvreur (1982) and Zinggeler (1989), this method derives the fracture energy from standard dynamics tests on a small sample; (b) Stokes et al (2005), this method is based on static winching experiments that calculate the energy required to cause a failure in the root system, (c) Brauner et al (2005), this method assumes that the banding energy is fully dissipated by the work expended to bend the tree stem to the point at which it breaks, (d) , derived the tree/boulder energy absorption capacity through real-size rockfall experiments on living trees, by measuring energy absorption as a function of tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and of rockfall impact eccentricity, (e) Lundström et al (2007Lundström et al ( , 2009, derived the energy absorption of trees subject to rockfall and root system anchorage mechanics, for many Alpine Conifer species, with a new approach and an experimental method, (f) Jonsson (2007), used full-scale impact test data to calibrating a numerical single tree impact model, using Finite Element Method (FEM), in this way the author can consider energy absorption of tree dependent on: DBH, tree/boulder impact height, angle and eccentricity, level of tree damage and material properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3), the encounter probability (P enc ) is given by Eq. 2, in a manner similar to that used by Brauner et al (2005) to estimate the probability of impact of a boulder with a tree in a forest stand.…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En complément, de nombreuses études [Brauner et al, 2005,Dorren et al, 2005,Sto el et al, 2006 ont montré que les forêts peuvent avoir un rôle de protection important contre les chutes de blocs. Par exemple, a déterminé qu'un épicéa ayant un diamètre de 0,6 m peut réduire l'énergie d'un bloc de 800 (kJ).…”
Section: Les Dispositifs De Protectionunclassified