2001
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-31-9-1551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest inventory of small areas combining the calibration estimator and a spatial model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the MSN estimates still produced negligibly low-biased predictions, though one may note that there is no reason for such estimates to be (approximately) unbiased. This follows Lappi (2001) who stated that off-site plots basically cannot be used if one insists on obtaining completely unbiased estimates for an area. In terms of SEI, RF models showed lower SEI values than those from MSN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the MSN estimates still produced negligibly low-biased predictions, though one may note that there is no reason for such estimates to be (approximately) unbiased. This follows Lappi (2001) who stated that off-site plots basically cannot be used if one insists on obtaining completely unbiased estimates for an area. In terms of SEI, RF models showed lower SEI values than those from MSN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Provided that the inventoried stands are within the span of stands for which forest attributes are of interest (i.e. comparable structure and variation), off-site samples from the inventoried stands can be used for prediction of target variables in target stands of interest (Lappi, 2001, Nothdurft et al 2009). Those off-site samples can facilitate regionalization of response variables using spatial models e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franco-Lopez et al 2001;Katila and Tomppo 2001;Reese et al 2003;Tomppo et al 2008) and also the Mahalanobis distance (Tokola et al 1996;Nilsson 1997;Fazakas et al 1999;Muinonen et al 2001) as well as similarity measure based on canonical correlation (Mouer and Stage 1995;Muinonen et al 2001) have been used. In small area estimation, sample plot weights can be interpreted as the area of similar forest as the plot represents in the total inventory area (Kilkki and Päivinen 1987;Tomppo 1996;Lappi 2001). Inventory area refers to the subregional, small area, such as a municipality, for which the forest statistics are calculated.…”
Section: Estimation Of Forest Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inventory area refers to the subregional, small area, such as a municipality, for which the forest statistics are calculated. Area interpretation is possible if the weights are positive and the same for all target variables (Tomppo 1996;Lappi 2001). However, the chosen nearest neighbours may not add up to unbiased or statistically optimal estimates for the total area (Lappi 2001).…”
Section: Estimation Of Forest Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data obtained in this manner are quite adequate for the needs of forest policy concerning the whole country, but they are of little use for the definition of regional, and especially local policy. The estimation of the forest damage degree in a forest district, national park or reserve, covering a relatively small area, but representing a high biological value, should be based on small-area methods which provide an adequate accuracy and can be utilised on a larger scale (LAPPI 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%