2019
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2019.1588989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest information at multiple scales: development, evaluation and application of the Norwegian forest resources map SR16

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forest species composition and structure employed in model fitting were based on the forest resource map "SR16", which was developed using photogrammetric and LiDAR point cloud data with ground plots from the Norwegian National Forest Inventory (NFI) [58]. The forest cover in SR16 is based on updating the forest cover in AR5 with object-based image analysis methods [59].…”
Section: Forest Cover and Structure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The forest species composition and structure employed in model fitting were based on the forest resource map "SR16", which was developed using photogrammetric and LiDAR point cloud data with ground plots from the Norwegian National Forest Inventory (NFI) [58]. The forest cover in SR16 is based on updating the forest cover in AR5 with object-based image analysis methods [59].…”
Section: Forest Cover and Structure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stand attributes, such as tree species, tree height (Lorey's), biomass, and volume are predicted with generalized linear models at a resolution of 16 m × 16 m with an accuracy (normalized RMSE) of 50% [58]. The forests in SR16 are classified as one of four classes: (1) newly clear-cut; (2) spruce;…”
Section: Forest Cover and Structure Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Nilsson et al (2017) utilized National Forest Inventory (NFI) field data and ALS data collected systematically over the country by the Swedish National Land Survey to obtain a nationwide forest attribute map for Sweden. Astrup et al (2019) constructed a similar map product for Norway, employing photogrammetric point clouds instead of ALS data. Other studies merged data from several ALS inventory projects to construct large area prediction models for forest attributes such as volume, biomass and dominant height (Gopalakrishnan et al 2015;Kotivuori et al 2016Kotivuori et al , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we present the development of forest tree type and timber volume maps for the federal state of Baden-Württemberg in south-west Germany. Recently, several studies have focused on the use of large-scale remote sensing data for mapping forest properties [5,[43][44][45][46]. Our study was motivated by the effort of the forest administration in Baden-Württemberg to support the field-work of the forest management experts by remote sensing-based information on forest resources for establishing forest management plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results fit into the general picture in this context and are in line with other studies. In a large-scale study in Norway, where three tree species spruce, pine, and broadleaf trees were classified using only a single date S2 scene, classification resulted in kappa of 0.59 for plots dominated by only one species, and in kappa of 0.5 when plots were included that were not dominated by a species group [46]. In another study in central Sweden on a small test area, classification of five tree species spruce, pine, larch, birch, and oak using a time series of S2 scenes resulted in a kappa of 0.84 [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%