2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40663-019-0173-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest in situ observations using unmanned aerial vehicle as an alternative of terrestrial measurements

Abstract: Background: Lately, terrestrial point clouds have drawn attention as a new data source for in situ forest investigations. So far, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has the highest data quality among all terrestrial point cloud data in terms of geometric accuracy and level of detail (IEEE Transact Geosci Remote Sens 53: 5117-5132, 2015). The TLS point clouds processed by automated algorithms can provide certain individual tree parameters at close to required accuracy in practical applications. However, all terre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
98
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies by Jaakkola et al [11] and Wallace et al [12] first introduced the use of UAV-LS for forest inventory. Since then, an increasing number of studies adopted single tree methods to assess biophysical properties such as tree height [13][14][15], tree crown properties [15][16][17], tree density [15], or diameter at breast height (DBH) measurements [14,18,19] and AGB [20,21]. The latter two variables are the most challenging and yet relevant, which potentially can justify the high costs of acquiring UAV-LS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early studies by Jaakkola et al [11] and Wallace et al [12] first introduced the use of UAV-LS for forest inventory. Since then, an increasing number of studies adopted single tree methods to assess biophysical properties such as tree height [13][14][15], tree crown properties [15][16][17], tree density [15], or diameter at breast height (DBH) measurements [14,18,19] and AGB [20,21]. The latter two variables are the most challenging and yet relevant, which potentially can justify the high costs of acquiring UAV-LS data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the reported omission errors from UAV-LS data (15%-80%) and difficulties of measuring DBH for all trees [20,21], it is not foreseeable in the near future to obtain UAV-LS based AGB or growing stock predictions for all trees in a population. A key scientific challenge is, therefore, to develop methods for using the available UAV-LS single tree measurements into plot-, stand-, or forest-level estimates while accounting for the non-probability nature of the sampled trees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvements for the estimates of TPH, G, Dg, Hg, and Vmean between [49] and our study is also noticeable indicating the effect of forest structure but also scan design in reliable characterization of forest structure. In [55] automatic and manual measurements of tree height from 3D point clouds acquired with a laser sensor mounted on an UAV were carried out and the results showed RMSE of ≥10% and bias of ~3%. Although, the inclusion of UAV point clouds provided only slightly lower RMSE (2.8%) and bias (-2.2%) for Hg compared to TLS data only (4.3% and -3.6%, respectively), RMSE especially was notably lower than reported by [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [55] automatic and manual measurements of tree height from 3D point clouds acquired with a laser sensor mounted on an UAV were carried out and the results showed RMSE of ≥10% and bias of ~3%. Although, the inclusion of UAV point clouds provided only slightly lower RMSE (2.8%) and bias (-2.2%) for Hg compared to TLS data only (4.3% and -3.6%, respectively), RMSE especially was notably lower than reported by [55]. Although there was a difference between UAV sensors the difference in heterogeneity in forest structure is assumed to be the main reason for the differences between these two studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is a promising technology for accurately retrieving stem curves because of its capability to document the 3D information of individual trees at the millimeter level (Dassot et al 2011;Liang et al 2019). Some studies have revealed high accuracies of the stem curve estimation using multi-scan TLS data (Liang et al 2013), in which the reported root mean square error (RMSE) of the estimated stem curves were about 1.2 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%