2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest impact on floods due to extreme rainfall and snowmelt in four Latin American environments 2: Model analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, transpiration depends on the actual/potential evapotranspiration (or crop coefficient) and this value was calibrated by taking into account differences between land-use types from previous simulations (e.g. Bathurst et al, 2011;Birkinshaw et al, 2014).…”
Section: Shetranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, transpiration depends on the actual/potential evapotranspiration (or crop coefficient) and this value was calibrated by taking into account differences between land-use types from previous simulations (e.g. Bathurst et al, 2011;Birkinshaw et al, 2014).…”
Section: Shetranmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although other parameters such as K sat or soil hydrological parameters are reported to be important, a choice was made based on previous studies [34,39,40,85,86] in order to limit run time. Based on the sum of R 2 , KGE, and NSE, several parameter sets gave satisfactory to good quality measures according to the equifinality concept introduced by Beven and Freer [16].…”
Section: Hydrological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters like Strickler overland flow resistance coefficient, Actual Evapotranspiration/Potential Evapotranspiration ratio and soil parameters namely soil depth, saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity functions were identified as key parameters required to be specified using field or calibrated data for flow simulations from studies conducted by Parkin [14], Bathurst et al [5,6] and Birkinshaw et al [18]. A sensitivity analysis of the above six parameters is performed to arrive at the final values.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial heterogeneity of rainfall in the model is accounted by using various spatial interpolation methods. The impact of different spatiotemporal resolution of rainfall input on simulated runoff, using hydrological models other than SHETRAN, was examined by many studies [4,5,6,7]. Dirks et al, compared four interpolation methods namely the Inverse distance weighted method, Theissen polygon, Kriging and Areal mean method using rainfall data from a network of thirteen rain gauges in Norfolk Island [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%