2006
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2006.870828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest height retrieval from commercial X-band SAR products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the best results on bare ground have a mean value below 20 cm for TerraSAR-X and 50cm for COSMO-SkyMed with a standard deviation of 2 meters. However, when moving into regions of forest a systematic canopy height underestimation is visible (like predicted from previous studies on InSAR processing over forest [21][22][23][24][25]28]). Tables 6 and 7 reveal that the standard deviation of height error drops a bit in regions of forest, while the mean height errors show systematic bias.…”
Section: Multi-image Dsm Generationsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, the best results on bare ground have a mean value below 20 cm for TerraSAR-X and 50cm for COSMO-SkyMed with a standard deviation of 2 meters. However, when moving into regions of forest a systematic canopy height underestimation is visible (like predicted from previous studies on InSAR processing over forest [21][22][23][24][25]28]). Tables 6 and 7 reveal that the standard deviation of height error drops a bit in regions of forest, while the mean height errors show systematic bias.…”
Section: Multi-image Dsm Generationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The reason for that is the fact, that the SAR signal in X-band penetrates into the forest canopy changing the InSAR phase center and therefore the reconstructed height. This aspect has been observed on InSAR-based processing of airborne X-band data [21][22][23]28], on X-band SRTM satellite data [7], on Radarsat-2 data [25], and on simulations [22,24].…”
Section: Multi-image Dsm Generationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X-HH derived h spc is at or very near bare ground (Mercer, 2001; blue dashed line, Figure 3) in barren areas; whereas in forest canopies the location of h spc depends on the penetration depth of microwaves into the canopy. This depth depends on wavelength, incidence angle, size and density distribution of the scattering elements, geometric arrangement of the scatterers, canopy moisture condition, surface roughness, and moisture content of the ground layer (Andersen et al, 2006;Izzawati et al, 2006;Woodhouse et al, 2006). Vegetation canopy heights given by X-HH InSAR h spc data are typically located in the upper portion of the vegetation canopy.…”
Section: Insar Incidence Angle and Scattering Phase Centre Height Bacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…digital surface model -DSM) to estimate the scattering phase centre height (h spc ; Kellndorfer et al, 2004;Simard et al, 2006;Andersen et al, 2008) to yield an estimate of vegetation canopy height. While a significant amount of research has been published on the application of InSAR for vegetation parameter extraction-in particular for vegetation canopy heightadditional research is needed to gain further understanding of the effect of incidence angle changes on InSAR derived vegetation canopy height given by h spc and methods must be International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B7, 2012 XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August -01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia employed that seek to minimize their influence, (Izzawati et al, 2006;Woodhouse et al, 2006;Balzter et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%