1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(96)03144-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest evaporation models: relationships between stand growth and evaporation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is contradicted by the typical sigmoidal change in streamflow with increasing tree or stand age observed in long-term studies (e.g. Bosch and Von Gadow, 1990;Dye, 1996;Le Maitre and Versfeld, 1997;Zhao et al, 2012), which is the result of increasing plant size and canopy cover. Initially a plantation comprises small saplings with < 1% canopy cover, and streamflow reductions are not detectable.…”
Section: Refining the Water-use Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assumption is contradicted by the typical sigmoidal change in streamflow with increasing tree or stand age observed in long-term studies (e.g. Bosch and Von Gadow, 1990;Dye, 1996;Le Maitre and Versfeld, 1997;Zhao et al, 2012), which is the result of increasing plant size and canopy cover. Initially a plantation comprises small saplings with < 1% canopy cover, and streamflow reductions are not detectable.…”
Section: Refining the Water-use Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Initially a plantation comprises small saplings with < 1% canopy cover, and streamflow reductions are not detectable. As the trees grow, the reductions in streamflow increase rapidly until they reach an asymptote (maximum) at about the stage when canopy cover reaches 100%, which is well before biomass peaks (Le Maitre and Versfeld, 1997). Unfortunately, there are insufficient data on the rate of canopy cover increase for invading plant species to be able to parameterise such a sigmoidal relationship.…”
Section: Refining the Water-use Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After afforestation in wet areas, the amount of direct runoff initially decreases rapidly, then gradually becomes constant, and baseflow increases slowly as stand age increases towards maturity (Fukushima, 1987;Kobayashi, 1987), suggesting that reforestation and afforestation help to reduce flooding and enhance water conservation. In water-limited areas, afforestation, especially plantations of species with high water demand, can cause a significant reduction in streamflow, affecting the inhabitants of the basin (Le Maitre and Versfeld, 1997), and reducing water flow to other ecosystems and rivers, thus affecting aquifers and recharge (Jackson et al, 2005 Stopping or slowing deforestation and forest degradation (loss of carbon density) and sustainable management of forests may significantly contribute to avoided emissions, may conserve water resources and prevent flooding, reduce runoff, control erosion, reduce siltation of rivers, and protect fisheries and investments in hydro-electric power facilities; and at the same time preserve biodiversity (Parrotta, 2002). [WGIII 9.7.2] Preserving forests conserves water resources and prevents flooding.…”
Section: 4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…492 E. F. Viglizzo et al: The dynamics of cultivation and floods their effect can be contrasting between temperate/tropical and wet/dry regions (Le Maitre and Versfeld, 1997;Calder 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%