2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-005-0040-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest ecosystems and environments: scaling up from shoot module to watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2013) used almost similar conceptual frameworks for non-spatial analysis of ES in varied contexts. Kohyama t al. (2005) and Nedkov et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2013) used almost similar conceptual frameworks for non-spatial analysis of ES in varied contexts. Kohyama t al. (2005) and Nedkov et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the importance of detailed canopy description for many applications, forest stand simulators very rarely address individual tree structural details (Sievänen et al 2008), mainly due to the high computing time required. Maintaining a high degree of structural detail when scaling up from organ level to stand (or landscape) remains an important challenge, as in general, the limitations of computer capacity require many simplifications in individual tree structure modelling (Kohyama et al 2005). To address this challenge, tree structure can be simply represented by crown envelope shape (Rautiainen et al 2008) or by using allometric relations (King 2005;West et al 2009), fractals (Collin et al 2011;Parsons et al 2011), "numerical tree modelling" (Collin et al 2011) or other geometric representations of tree architecture (Cescatti 1997;Perttunen et al 1998;Biliouris et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on their objectives, models of forest stand dynamics may account for individual tree structure or not (Kohyama et al 2005;Pretzsch 2009;Feng et al 2012). Schematically, stand-level models can be subdivided in "Empirical Forest Models", mostly used for forest management purposes, and "Process Based Models", which aim at assessing biomass production at the stand level, based on ecophysiological process, and these two types of models can be combined into "hybrid simulation models" (Mäkelä et al 2000;Kimmins et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%