2014
DOI: 10.1002/2013gl058691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest ecosystem changes from annual methane source to sink depending on late summer water balance

Abstract: Forests dominate the global carbon cycle, but their role in methane (CH 4 ) biogeochemistry remains uncertain. We analyzed whole-ecosystem CH 4 fluxes from 2 years, obtained over a lowland evergreen forest in Maine, USA. Gross primary productivity provided the strongest correlation with the CH 4 flux in both years, with an additional significant effect of soil moisture in the second, drier year. This forest was a neutral to net source of CH 4 in 2011 and a small net sink in 2012. Interannual variability in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, high-frequency field observational data are also needed, particularly long-term observational data in some less-studied ecosystems; for example, Arctic tundra ecosystems have been considered an important contributor to the global CH 4 budget in the changing climate (IPCC, 2013;Koven et al, 2011); however, a longterm data set of CH 4 flux is lacking. It is well known that inter-annual variation of climate may turn an ecosystem from a CH 4 sink to a CH 4 source (Nauta et al, 2015;Shoemaker et al, 2014); therefore, a long-term observational data set that covers these temporal shifts in CH 4 flux and its associated ecosystem information would improve our understanding of the processes and our representation of them in CH 4 models. Second, microbial community shifts and their role in CH 4 processes are important, although information is incomplete for model representation of this mechanism (McCalley et al, 2014;Schimel and Gulledge, 1998).…”
Section: Data Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, high-frequency field observational data are also needed, particularly long-term observational data in some less-studied ecosystems; for example, Arctic tundra ecosystems have been considered an important contributor to the global CH 4 budget in the changing climate (IPCC, 2013;Koven et al, 2011); however, a longterm data set of CH 4 flux is lacking. It is well known that inter-annual variation of climate may turn an ecosystem from a CH 4 sink to a CH 4 source (Nauta et al, 2015;Shoemaker et al, 2014); therefore, a long-term observational data set that covers these temporal shifts in CH 4 flux and its associated ecosystem information would improve our understanding of the processes and our representation of them in CH 4 models. Second, microbial community shifts and their role in CH 4 processes are important, although information is incomplete for model representation of this mechanism (McCalley et al, 2014;Schimel and Gulledge, 1998).…”
Section: Data Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring CH 4 exchange is more challenging than measuring CO 2 exchange due to low flux rates from spatially restricted areas within a forest and therefore relatively few MM studies exist to date (Nicolini 2013). CH 4 exchange between forest stands and the atmosphere has been measured by EC (Smeets et al, 2009;Shoemaker et al, 2014), relaxed EC (Sakabe et al, 2012;Ueyama et al, 2012), and by gradient methods (Simpson et al, 1997;Bowling et al, 2009;Querino et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because diffusive gas transport through soils is reduced with increasing SWC, hydrologic variations can strongly affect soil O 2 levels, which in turn influence the relative rates of (anaerobic) methanogenesis and (aerobic) methanotrophy. Although saturated soils (e.g., wetlands) are major terrestrial sources of CH 4 emissions (6), emission may at times occur from unsaturated soils, depending on the finescale heterogeneity of soil redox status (7); in some cases, CH 4 source/sink switching behavior is observed with seasonal flooding or drydown (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).Little is known about how soil microbial community structure is influenced by both historical and contemporary environmental conditions of subalpine forested soils (13) and how microbial community structure might correlate with soil fluxes of CO 2 and CH 4 . Landscape factors that may influence the occurrence and abundance of microorganisms include geographic location (14), topographic features such as drainages (15), and soil characteristics across spatial scales (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because diffusive gas transport through soils is reduced with increasing SWC, hydrologic variations can strongly affect soil O 2 levels, which in turn influence the relative rates of (anaerobic) methanogenesis and (aerobic) methanotrophy. Although saturated soils (e.g., wetlands) are major terrestrial sources of CH 4 emissions (6), emission may at times occur from unsaturated soils, depending on the finescale heterogeneity of soil redox status (7); in some cases, CH 4 source/sink switching behavior is observed with seasonal flooding or drydown (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%