2008
DOI: 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[275:fdiana]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest Dynamics in a Natural Area of the Southern Ridge and Valley, Tennessee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, retrospective studies of old-growth forests in eastern North America have revealed that many of these systems experienced multiple intermediate-scale disturbances which had marked impacts on development and succession (e.g. Oliver and Stephens, 1977;Orwig et al, 2001;Fraver and White, 2005;Hart et al, 2008Hart et al, , 2012Pederson et al, in press). Furthermore, research has indicated that the frequency of intermediate-scale disturbance in the Eastern Deciduous Forest Formation of North America may have declined over the past three centuries and this decline may in part explain widespread successional patterns throughout the region .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, retrospective studies of old-growth forests in eastern North America have revealed that many of these systems experienced multiple intermediate-scale disturbances which had marked impacts on development and succession (e.g. Oliver and Stephens, 1977;Orwig et al, 2001;Fraver and White, 2005;Hart et al, 2008Hart et al, , 2012Pederson et al, in press). Furthermore, research has indicated that the frequency of intermediate-scale disturbance in the Eastern Deciduous Forest Formation of North America may have declined over the past three centuries and this decline may in part explain widespread successional patterns throughout the region .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is no expectation that a 100% of the sampled stems demonstrate a release (Nowacki and Abrams, 1997;Pederson et al, 2008). In most situations the 25% cutoff is a conservative value and a much higher percentage of trees demonstrate a release event during a stand-wide disturbance (Busby et al, 2008b;Hart et al, 2008). Therefore, the variation of within-tree release identification will be unlikely to substantially alter the identification of large-scale stand-wide disturbance events and in most situations it will be acceptable to continue Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Identifying pulses of increased growth within tree-ring series is the primary method for assessing canopy disturbance [20,37,41,42]. Release events were determined to be periods in which raw-ring width was ≥25% (minor) or ≥50% (major) of the 10-year preceding and superseding mean [37], sustained for a minimum of three years [39,40,43]. Because we utilized two cores per tree, analyses were combined to create a single composite disturbance history for each individual.…”
Section: Laboratory and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%