Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest disturbance and arthropods: Small‐scale canopy gaps drive invertebrate community structure and composition

Abstract: 2018. Forest disturbance and arthropods: Small-scale canopy gaps drive invertebrate community structure and composition. Ecosphere 9(10):Abstract. In forest ecosystems, disturbances that cause tree mortality create canopy gaps, increase growth of understory vegetation, and alter the abiotic environment. These impacts may have interacting effects on populations of ground-dwelling invertebrates that regulate ecological processes such as decomposition and nutrient cycling. A manipulative experiment was designed t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that, although dependent on forest proximity, some Malagasy dung beetles tolerate more microclimatic variation than previously thought. On the other hand, certain level of forest disturbance may also increase the types of microhabitat available which, in case there are different species with different temperature optima, could explain some of the increase in dung beetle diversity in disturbed vegetation (Mehrabi et al, ; Perry, Wallin, Wenzel, & Herms, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that, although dependent on forest proximity, some Malagasy dung beetles tolerate more microclimatic variation than previously thought. On the other hand, certain level of forest disturbance may also increase the types of microhabitat available which, in case there are different species with different temperature optima, could explain some of the increase in dung beetle diversity in disturbed vegetation (Mehrabi et al, ; Perry, Wallin, Wenzel, & Herms, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tree microhabitat by GDAs may be either specific or random. Our study suggests the latter for PJ woodlands, yet, there are many instances where GDAs are sensitive to changes in vegetation structure [45][46][47][48][49]. Canopy-closure creates microhabitats which host different GDA communities than open areas [50], including in PJ woodlands [26][27][28].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Canopy-closure creates microhabitats which host different GDA communities than open areas [ 50 ], including in PJ woodlands [ 26 28 ]. So, while most GDAs may not be affected by tree composition, some may be confined to canopied habitat with open habitats acting as barriers [ 46 ]. How isolated a tree is may affect what GDAs occur under it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canopy openness can affects resource availability and habitat quality in forest understory through various direct, indirect and interacting pathways; directly by influencing light availability, temperature, soil moisture, indirectly as a result of changes to decomposition of organic matter and nutrient cycling, vegetation growth and composition, food and shelter availability for organisms (Ritter et al ., ; Gálhidy et al ., ; Muscolo et al ., ). These direct and indirect changes to understory can interact to affect resources and habitat quality and quantity, and biodiversity characteristics (Blakely & Didham, ; Thorn et al ., ; Perry et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%