2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest disturbance across the conterminous United States from 1985–2012: The emerging dominance of forest decline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
192
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
192
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relief of the study area is created by a peneplain with numerous local hills. The elevation ranges from 700 m to 1453 m with an average elevation of 1093 m. distinguished different defoliator and bark beetle effects [37], duration and severity of insect disturbances [38], and large-scale drivers of primary forest disturbance events [39]. A similar trajectory-based approach could be used to detect less pronounced pre-disturbance forest state changes which predispose the forest to disturbances [40].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relief of the study area is created by a peneplain with numerous local hills. The elevation ranges from 700 m to 1453 m with an average elevation of 1093 m. distinguished different defoliator and bark beetle effects [37], duration and severity of insect disturbances [38], and large-scale drivers of primary forest disturbance events [39]. A similar trajectory-based approach could be used to detect less pronounced pre-disturbance forest state changes which predispose the forest to disturbances [40].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of spectral trajectories based on Landsat imagery helped to describe forest disturbance history since 1972 [34], encouraging forest recovery [35], and detecting bark beetle-affected forest stands more precisely [36]. The following studies distinguished different defoliator and bark beetle effects [37], duration and severity of insect disturbances [38], and large-scale drivers of primary forest disturbance events [39]. A similar trajectory-based approach could be used to detect less pronounced pre-disturbance forest state changes which predispose the forest to disturbances [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field surveys are the most accurate approach to examine forest In recent years, the two algorithms LandTrendr [24,[41][42][43][44][45] and BFAST [16,33,46,47] often have been used to detect forest disturbance and recovery in North America. There are also other algorithms such as Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) [48] and Continuous Monitoring of Forest Disturbance Algorithm (CMFDA) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, in the study that developed the harmonic modeling approach we adapted to detect microrefugia, demonstrated that dense time series of all available Landsat data enabled detection of subtle forest thinning. Other studies, more commonly using time series of annual images (including composite images; eg, Roy et al, 2010), emphasize the power of LTS to detect gradual processes including forest decline due to diffuse disturbances such as insect outbreaks or drought (Ahmed et al, 2017;Cohen et al, 2016;Deel et al, 2012;Kennedy et al, 2010), forest succession and woodland densification (Vogelmann et al, 2012), and variation in ecosystem recovery following disturbance (Kennedy et al, 2007(Kennedy et al, , 2010Lawrence and Ripple, 1999;Storey et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%