2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest composition, leaf litter, and songbird communities in oak- vs. maple-dominated forests in the eastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we documented a positive association between Ovenbird density and core forest cover within 500 and 1,000 m radii. This finding was not unexpected, because impacts of Lumbricus in North America have been most commonly documented in maple-basswood forests, both within our study region (Gundale et al 2005;Hale et al 2005Hale et al , 2006Holdsworth et al 2007a, b) and in the northeastern U.S. (Lawrence et al 2003;Fox et al 2010). Studies finding Lumbricus impacts in other forest types are less common (but see Alban and Barry 1994;Nuzzo et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, we documented a positive association between Ovenbird density and core forest cover within 500 and 1,000 m radii. This finding was not unexpected, because impacts of Lumbricus in North America have been most commonly documented in maple-basswood forests, both within our study region (Gundale et al 2005;Hale et al 2005Hale et al , 2006Holdsworth et al 2007a, b) and in the northeastern U.S. (Lawrence et al 2003;Fox et al 2010). Studies finding Lumbricus impacts in other forest types are less common (but see Alban and Barry 1994;Nuzzo et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Negative effects of Lumbricus on vertebrates have been documented in other regions. Fox et al (2010) observed that ground-nesting songbirds were absent from a heavily invaded sugar maple forest in southern Indiana, and Maerz et al (2009) documented exponential declines of woodland salamanders in response to earthworm-caused reduction of litter depth in the northeastern U.S. More research is needed to clarify whether additional vertebrate species, such as small mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and other ground-nesting and ground-foraging birds, are affected by earthworm invasions and associated habitat changes. Furthermore, future research should address how potentially at-risk species are affected by interactions between earthworms and other stressors, including climate change, plant invasions, herbivory by over-abundant deer populations, and shifts in disturbance regimes (e.g., Frelich and Reich 2009).…”
Section: Regional Implications For Ovenbird Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lack of early successional habitat in the eastern US, which savannas and open woodlands provide, is a major concern in wildlife conservation [49][50][51]. Savannas and woodlands support some of the highest levels of plant diversity [52][53][54], which begets a greater abundance of varied resources and habitats needed to conserve threatened and endangered wildlife species [55][56][57][58]. Both the dominance of oak tree crowns in the canopy and oak litter on the forest floor increase ecosystem productivity by supporting a greater diversity and abundance of invertebrates involved in energy and nutrient cycles than those communities without oak [59][60][61][62].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exclusion of key soil macrofauna (e.g., non-native earthworms) due to the 1 mm 2 mesh size of litter bags likely limited overall fragmentation in both studies compared to natural conditions. For example, litter decomposition rates are often more than eight-times greater in earthworm-accessible large mesh litter bags than in fine mesh bags that exclude them in temperate deciduous forests (Holdsworth et al, 2008; Fox et al, 2010). Therefore, we likely underestimated decay rates in both studies compared to natural conditions by excluding various soil faunal fragmenters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%