2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00384-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forest age-induced changes in evapotranspiration and water yield in a eucalypt forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
98
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
98
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Wood et al offered no alternative explanation for why stream flows declined by as much as 50% in areas where oldgrowth E. regnans forest was converted to regrowth. Such declines have been reported in several paired catchment studies in this forest type (Bren et al 2010) and in other wet eucalypt forests (Cornish and Vertessy 2001;Lane and Mackay 2001).…”
Section: Additional Comments On Wood Et Alsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Wood et al offered no alternative explanation for why stream flows declined by as much as 50% in areas where oldgrowth E. regnans forest was converted to regrowth. Such declines have been reported in several paired catchment studies in this forest type (Bren et al 2010) and in other wet eucalypt forests (Cornish and Vertessy 2001;Lane and Mackay 2001).…”
Section: Additional Comments On Wood Et Alsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This decline suggests a change in stomatal function for greater control that extends beyond the scope of the influence of falling LAI to conserve soil water. A similar argument has been mounted from Karuah, New South Wales, where a phase of pronounced streamflow reduction has occurred in the aftermath of forest clearing of experimental forested catchments with average rainfall ranging between 1475 and 1750 mm (Cornish and Vertessy, 2001). These communities are dominated by E. saligna and E. laevopinea; the rapid water use in the regrowth phase resembles E. regnans with a phase of reduced streamflow in the early stages of forest succession.…”
Section: Forest Managementsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…With long-term fire data from 1949 to 1994 in southern California, Loaiciga et al (2001) also found the signal of annual streamflow increase up to 20-30% in fire-impacted water years (with 3 year carryover effect) relative to non-fire years. A group from Melbourne, Australia (Langford, 1976;Kuczera, 1987;Cornish and Vertessy, 2001;Watson et al, 2001) showed that fire in Eucalyptus forest was followed by a 2-3 year increase in streamflow, then decreases in streamflow over the following one to two decades when re-growth was established. They pointed out that a difference in transpiration is the most likely cause in the mature forest consuming less water than the re-growth forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the control and treated parts of the catchment are calibrated against each other using several years of data before and following fire, the catchment response to the fire can be evaluated. There are many documented studies using this method (e.g., Langford, 1976;Helvey, 1980;Homes and Wronski, 1982;Kuczera, 1987;Cornish and Vertessy, 2001;Loaiciga et al, 2001;Roberts et al, 2001;Townsend and Douglas, 2000;Watson et al, 2001) employing techniques of analysis such as double-mass curve, flow duration curve, statistical regression and others. On the other hand, paired-catchment analysis must be used with discretion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%