Forensic training at internships: Update and criticism of current unspecified training models.

Lawlor, Richard J.; Siskind, George; Brooks, James D.

doi:10.1037/0735-7028.12.3.400

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kaslow and Abrams (1976) described details of a particular forensic program at Hahnemann Medical College and argued for the need to train psychologists in forensic work, which they described as turbulent, obviously a precursor of things to come. Later, Lawlor, Siskind, and Brooks (1981) (Durand, Blanchard, & Mindell, 1988;Piatrowski, 1984) concluded that, though many intern directors value projective techniques and expect interns to know these instruments, the academic community was less supportive regarding their value. One study noted a decline in the role for projective techniques.…”

Section: What Interns Should Be and Are Taughtmentioning

confidence: 99%

What we know about predoctoral internship training: A review.

Stedman

1997

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Each year approximately 2,500-3,000 students, primarily from clinical and counseling psychology programs, seek internship programs. But what is known about this key educational event? This article attempts to answer that question by reviewing the internship-related literature of the last 22 years. Existing literature demonstrates that there is a substantial body of knowledge but also points to the need for updates of old data and for additional new investigations.The clinical psychology internship was inaugurated in 1949 at the American Psychological Association's (APA's) Boulder Conference (Raimy, 1950) when delegates recommended both a university experience and an internship sequence as essential in the training of clinical psychologists. In 1952, the Division of Counseling Psychology followed suit by recommending a predoctoral internship training sequence for its students. Later, in 1956, as quality control became an issue, the APA, through its Office of Accreditation, began accrediting clinical and counseling internships. In 1968, the Association of Psychology Internship Centers (now the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers [ APPIC]) was organized to respond to a growing array of internship issues that were beyond the scope of accreditation, and today APPIC stands as an essential organization concerned with all issues relevant to pre-and postdoctoral field training in clinical and counseling psychology.The internship has been and continues to be a required and essential ingredient in the training of clinical and counseling psychologists. But what is known about this key educational event? This article seeks to answer that question by reviewing internship-related literature generated over the past 22 years (1974 to 1996). A computer search of the PsycLIT database revealed over 269 entries during this period, including many

show abstract

Section: What Interns Should Be and Are Taughtmentioning

confidence: 99%

What we know about predoctoral internship training: A review.

Stedman

1997

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kaslow and Abrams (1976) de-scribed details of a particular forensic program at Hahnemann Medical College and argued for the need to train psychologists in forensic work, which they described as turbulent, obviously a precursor of things to come. Later, Lawlor, Siskind, and Brooks (1981) determined that forensic training was more prevalent but characterized it as haphazard, uncoordinated, and unplanned.…”

Section: What Interns Should Be and Are Taughtmentioning

confidence: 99%

What we know about predoctoral internship training: A review.

Stedman¹

2006

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The purpose of this article is not to provide an exhaustive list and descriptions of all forensic training and credentialing opportunities. Readers seeking this information are directed elsewhere (Heilbrun & Annis, 1988;Lawlor, Siskind, & Brooks, 1981;Levine, Wilson, & Sales, 1980;Ogloff, 1990;Roesch et al, 1986).…”

Section: R K Otto E T Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

Training and credentialing in forensic psychology

Otto

Heilbrun²,

Grisso³

1990

Behavioral Sci & The Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The number of training programs in forensic psychology has grown considerably in the past 15 years. Numerous opportunities exist for individuals interested in pursuing careers in the forensic area. Interdisciplinary training in several forms is discussed: J.D. -Ph.D. programs, specialist Ph.D. programs, predoctoral internships, and postdoctoral fellowships. Continuing professional education, credentialing, and board certification in forensic psychology are also addressed. Despite the face validity ofthese various types of training and credentialing, little is known about their relative utilities.

show abstract

Forensic training at internships: Update and criticism of current unspecified training models.

Cited by 9 publications

References 7 publications

What we know about predoctoral internship training: A review.

What we know about predoctoral internship training: A review.

What we know about predoctoral internship training: A review.

Training and credentialing in forensic psychology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About