2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Forensic’ labelling: An empirical assessment of its effects on self-stigma for people with severe mental illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristics included use of a violent suicide method (6), living with a partner or a dependent who was also a psychiatric patient (22), unemployment (23), minority racial or ethnic group (24), residence in the United Kingdom for less than five years (25), forensic history (26), childhood abuse history (27), recent alcohol misuse (28), recent drug misuse (28), primary diagnosis of alcohol dependence or misuse (29), and primary diagnosis of drug dependence or misuse (28). We used the ONS suicide classification to define dying by violent means: hanging/strangulation, jumping (from a height/in front of a moving vehicle), firearms, cutting/stabbing, burning, drowning, electrocution, and asphyxiation/suffocation.…”
Section: Key Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics included use of a violent suicide method (6), living with a partner or a dependent who was also a psychiatric patient (22), unemployment (23), minority racial or ethnic group (24), residence in the United Kingdom for less than five years (25), forensic history (26), childhood abuse history (27), recent alcohol misuse (28), recent drug misuse (28), primary diagnosis of alcohol dependence or misuse (29), and primary diagnosis of drug dependence or misuse (28). We used the ONS suicide classification to define dying by violent means: hanging/strangulation, jumping (from a height/in front of a moving vehicle), firearms, cutting/stabbing, burning, drowning, electrocution, and asphyxiation/suffocation.…”
Section: Key Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…647 Stigma has been attributed to and associated with a wide range of attitudes, behaviors, circumstances, health conditions, social influences, and outcomes, including QOL, self-esteem, self-appraisal of competence, recovery, empowerment, social support, social integration, psychiatric symptoms, anxiety, avoidance/withdrawal, medication adherence, secrecy, and social and psychological functioning. [647][648][649][650][651][652][653] Pescosolido et al 654 elucidate the ways in which stigma comes to be defined in, and enacted through, social interactions, making clear that while stigma attaches to individuals, individuals do not develop beliefs and attitudes in a void but rather are influenced by a host and range of social, economic, cultural, and political contexts that shape expectations and cognitive processing. This framework 654 articulates the ways in which these contributing factors interact to produce stigma and discrimination, incorporating a wide range of theoretical constructs from labeling theory, social network theory, the limited capacity model of media influence, the social psychology of prejudice and discrimination, and theories of the welfare state.…”
Section: Patient-centered Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…647,654 At the social level, large groups or societies support stereotypes about and against a particular subgroup of people, which may be enacted through discriminatory practices, including by clinicians. 655 Structural stigma exists in the world of policies, laws, rules, and procedures that restrict the rights of the stigmatized group.…”
Section: Patient-centered Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations